The presumption of innocence in mexican administrative law and other countries

The presumption of innocence is one of the guiding principles of criminal procedure in the country, which has the highest normative status when foreseen in the federal Constitution (article 20-B-I). However, in order to transfer it to its recognition to the sanctioning administrative law - specifica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: ORTEGA MALDONADO, JUAN MANUEL; 31510, GARCIA ATRA, LIZETH JULIANA; 665492
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:México
Institución:Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
Repositorio:Repositorio Institucional de Acceso Abierto RIAA-BUAP
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorioinstitucional.buap.mx:20.500.12371/4374
Acceso en línea:http://www.apps.buap.mx/ojs3/index.php/dike/article/view/527
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12371/4374
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Presumption of innocence, comparative law, disciplinary sanctioning authority, sanctioning administrative law, disciplinary sanctioning law
presunción de inocencia; derecho comparado; potestad sancionatoria disciplinaria; derecho administrativo sancionador; derecho sancionador disciplinario
Descripción
Sumario:The presumption of innocence is one of the guiding principles of criminal procedure in the country, which has the highest normative status when foreseen in the federal Constitution (article 20-B-I). However, in order to transfer it to its recognition to the sanctioning administrative law - specifically to the disciplinary administrative law - is not a simple matter, since its contours are diffuse. Hence, the approach of its content and its scope can be facilitated if we turn to comparative law, which has been broadly studied.