The Obligation of the Control of Conventionalityin the Light of the Law of Treaties
This paper aims at examining whether there are international norms underlying the State obligation to carry out a control of conventionality within the domestic legal system. We argue that this international State obligation is based on articles 26 and 27 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13328 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derecho-internacional/article/view/13328 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | control of conventionality Inter-American Convention on Human Rights InterAmerican Court of Human Rights principle of effectiveness international interpretation control de convencionalidad Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos principio de efectividad interpretación internacional contrôle de conventionalité Convention Interaméricaine sur les droits de l’homme Cour Interaméricaine des Droits de l’homme principe de effectivité interprétation international |
| Sumario: | This paper aims at examining whether there are international norms underlying the State obligation to carry out a control of conventionality within the domestic legal system. We argue that this international State obligation is based on articles 26 and 27 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. This study examines the relevant literature and applies the interpretation principles provided for theVienna Convention itself. |
|---|