Estimation of general and specific combining ability effects for quality protein maize inbred lines

Background: Maize (Zea mays L.) plays a critical role in meeting high food demand. It is globally one of the most widely adapted and cultivated crops. Hybrid development from fixed inbred lines is one of the strategies for the improvement of maize production. The national average maize yield in Ethi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Goshime Muluneh Mekasha, Chere, A.T., Ali, H.M., Dagne Wegary Gissa, Solomon Admassu Seyoum
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:México
Institución:Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo
Repositorio:Repositorio Institucional de Publicaciones Multimedia del CIMMYT
OAI Identifier:oai:repository.cimmyt.org:10883/22927
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10883/22927
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
General Combining Ability
Specific Combining Ability
COMBINING ABILITY
MAIZE
PROTEIN QUALITY
INBRED LINES
DATA ANALYSIS
Maize
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Maize (Zea mays L.) plays a critical role in meeting high food demand. It is globally one of the most widely adapted and cultivated crops. Hybrid development from fixed inbred lines is one of the strategies for the improvement of maize production. The national average maize yield in Ethiopia is low and thus, selection of promising germplasm and knowledge of combining ability are prerequisites to developing high yielding maize varieties. Forty-two Quality Protein Maize (QPM) crosses (21 inbred lines each crossed with two testers) along with three popular standard hybrids were evaluated in two replications using alpha lattice during the 2017 cropping season at Ambo, Arsi-Negele, and Kulumsa. The objectives of this study were to identify lines with high GCA and estimate the SCA of crosses for grain yield, and other agronomic and morphological characters. Results: Significant difference among crosses was observed for 19 traits at Ambo, 14 traits at ArsiNegele, and 19 traits at Kulumsa in the hybrid trial. Regarding the GCA effect, L8 had a significant difference to the positive side with the highest magnitude of GCA effect at three locations (3.40, 2.03, and 1.88 GCA effect values at Arsi-Negele, Ambo, and Kulumsa, respectively) which is followed by L7 for GY. All crosses did not show a significant SCA effect for GY in both directions at Ambo and Arsi-Negele but at Kulumsa, five crosses: L2xT1(1.89), L13xT2(1.88), L7xT1(1.86), L4xT2(1.49) and L19xT1(1.41) showed significant difference. In the combined analysis for six traits, Additive gene action was more important which was manifested by a higher sum square contribution of DS (79.6) EPP (79.3%), EL (80.0%), KPR (80.1%), ED (78.5%) and TSW (79.1%). Conclusion: Based on mean grain yield, and combining ability, L8xT2, L7xT1, L8xT1, L19xT1, L6xT2, and L18xT1 are promising crosses that could be forwarded for further use in maize breeding programs for further works.