Reply to Comment on ‘Electromagnetic potentials without gauge transformation’
This is a reply to the criticism from Engelhardt and Onoochin of our work (2011 Phys. Scr. 84 015009): a general argument for the possibility of different solutions in different gauges unrelated to gauge transformation; a result that has been given by Engelhardt and Onoochin using examples. For this...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2012 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Institucional Caxcán |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:http://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx:20.500.11845/520 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11845/520 https://doi.org/10.48779/902f-vh37 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | CIENCIAS FISICO MATEMATICAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA TIERRA [1] Maxwell’s equations Electromagnetic potentials |
| Sumario: | This is a reply to the criticism from Engelhardt and Onoochin of our work (2011 Phys. Scr. 84 015009): a general argument for the possibility of different solutions in different gauges unrelated to gauge transformation; a result that has been given by Engelhardt and Onoochin using examples. For this reason we are not in any sense trying to refute the statements made by Engelhardt and Onoochin, instead we are offering a possible theoretical explanation of their results. |
|---|