State of emergency or normality? The extensions of the Legislative Decree number 333 of the Republic of El Salvador
One of the main characteristics of the state of emergency is that the suspension of certain rights must be temporary in order to address external and internal threats. However, El Salvador has extended it for more than a year as a way to restore public order and control over the territory owing to s...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Cuestiones Constitucionales. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19094 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/cuestiones-constitucionales/article/view/19094 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | rule of law human rights Nayib Bukele El Salvador bukelism state of emergency temporality Estado de derecho derechos humanos bukelismo régimen de excepción temporalidad |
| Sumario: | One of the main characteristics of the state of emergency is that the suspension of certain rights must be temporary in order to address external and internal threats. However, El Salvador has extended it for more than a year as a way to restore public order and control over the territory owing to serious disturbances to public order by criminal structures that threaten the life, peace, and security of the Salvadoran population. Therefore, this article delves into bukelism as a realistic strategy to completely eliminate crime in the country, and provides an analysis of the extensions that the Legislative Decree number 333 has had, through which exceptional measures are adopted in El Salvador during the presidency of Nayib Bukele. 333 has had, through which exceptional measures are adopted in El Salvador during the presidency of Nayib Bukele. |
|---|