To denoise or to cluster? That is not the question. Optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography
Background: The recent blooming of metabarcoding applications to biodiversity studies comes with some relevant methodological debates. One such issue concerns the treatment of reads by denoising or by clustering methods, which have been wrongly presented as alternatives. It has also been suggested t...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:2445/177185 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/177185 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Biodiversitat Anàlisi de conglomerats Seqüència de nucleòtids Biodiversity Cluster analysis Nucleotide sequence |
| id |
ES_fdec8ffd4d0fb14ad8e2a8bb13ff55a1 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:recercat.cat:2445/177185 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
To denoise or to cluster? That is not the question. Optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeographyAntich, AdriàPalacín Cabañas, CruzWangensteen Fuentes, Owen S. (Simon)Turon, XavierBiodiversitatAnàlisi de conglomeratsSeqüència de nucleòtidsBiodiversityCluster analysisNucleotide sequenceBackground: The recent blooming of metabarcoding applications to biodiversity studies comes with some relevant methodological debates. One such issue concerns the treatment of reads by denoising or by clustering methods, which have been wrongly presented as alternatives. It has also been suggested that denoised sequence variants should replace clusters as the basic unit of metabarcoding analyses, missing the fact that sequence clusters are a proxy for species-level entities, the basic unit in biodiversity studies. We argue here that methods developed and tested for ribosomal markers have been uncritically applied to highly variable markers such as cytochrome oxidase I (COI) without conceptual or operational (e.g., parameter setting) adjustment. COI has a naturally high intraspecies variability that should be assessed and reported, as it is a source of highly valuable information. We contend that denoising and clustering are not alternatives. Rather, they are complementary and both should be used together in COI metabarcoding pipelines. Results: Using a COI dataset from benthic marine communities, we compared two denoising procedures (based on the UNOISE3 and the DADA2 algorithms), set suitable parameters for denoising and clustering, and applied these steps in diferent orders. Our results indicated that the UNOISE3 algorithm preserved a higher intra-cluster variability. We introduce the program DnoisE to implement the UNOISE3 algorithm taking into account the natural variability (measured as entropy) of each codon position in protein-coding genes. This correction increased the number of sequences retained by 88%. The order of the steps (denoising and clustering) had little infuence on the fnal outcome. Conclusions: We highlight the need for combining denoising and clustering, with adequate choice of stringency parameters, in COI metabarcoding. We present a program that uses the coding properties of this marker to improve the denoising step. We recommend researchers to report their results in terms of both denoised sequences (a proxy for haplotypes) and clusters formed (a proxy for species), and to avoid collapsing the sequences of the latter into a single representative. This will allow studies at the cluster (ideally equating species-level diversity) and at the intra-cluster level, and will ease additivity and comparability between studies.BioMed Central2021202120212021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion24 p.application/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/177185Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04115-6BMC Bioinformatics, 2021, vol. 22, p. 177https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04115-6cc-by (c) Antich, Adrià et al., 2021https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:2445/1771852026-05-29T05:05:01Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
To denoise or to cluster? That is not the question. Optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography |
| title |
To denoise or to cluster? That is not the question. Optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography |
| spellingShingle |
To denoise or to cluster? That is not the question. Optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography Antich, Adrià Biodiversitat Anàlisi de conglomerats Seqüència de nucleòtids Biodiversity Cluster analysis Nucleotide sequence |
| title_short |
To denoise or to cluster? That is not the question. Optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography |
| title_full |
To denoise or to cluster? That is not the question. Optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography |
| title_fullStr |
To denoise or to cluster? That is not the question. Optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography |
| title_full_unstemmed |
To denoise or to cluster? That is not the question. Optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography |
| title_sort |
To denoise or to cluster? That is not the question. Optimizing pipelines for COI metabarcoding and metaphylogeography |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Antich, Adrià Palacín Cabañas, Cruz Wangensteen Fuentes, Owen S. (Simon) Turon, Xavier |
| author |
Antich, Adrià |
| author_facet |
Antich, Adrià Palacín Cabañas, Cruz Wangensteen Fuentes, Owen S. (Simon) Turon, Xavier |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Palacín Cabañas, Cruz Wangensteen Fuentes, Owen S. (Simon) Turon, Xavier |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Biodiversitat Anàlisi de conglomerats Seqüència de nucleòtids Biodiversity Cluster analysis Nucleotide sequence |
| topic |
Biodiversitat Anàlisi de conglomerats Seqüència de nucleòtids Biodiversity Cluster analysis Nucleotide sequence |
| description |
Background: The recent blooming of metabarcoding applications to biodiversity studies comes with some relevant methodological debates. One such issue concerns the treatment of reads by denoising or by clustering methods, which have been wrongly presented as alternatives. It has also been suggested that denoised sequence variants should replace clusters as the basic unit of metabarcoding analyses, missing the fact that sequence clusters are a proxy for species-level entities, the basic unit in biodiversity studies. We argue here that methods developed and tested for ribosomal markers have been uncritically applied to highly variable markers such as cytochrome oxidase I (COI) without conceptual or operational (e.g., parameter setting) adjustment. COI has a naturally high intraspecies variability that should be assessed and reported, as it is a source of highly valuable information. We contend that denoising and clustering are not alternatives. Rather, they are complementary and both should be used together in COI metabarcoding pipelines. Results: Using a COI dataset from benthic marine communities, we compared two denoising procedures (based on the UNOISE3 and the DADA2 algorithms), set suitable parameters for denoising and clustering, and applied these steps in diferent orders. Our results indicated that the UNOISE3 algorithm preserved a higher intra-cluster variability. We introduce the program DnoisE to implement the UNOISE3 algorithm taking into account the natural variability (measured as entropy) of each codon position in protein-coding genes. This correction increased the number of sequences retained by 88%. The order of the steps (denoising and clustering) had little infuence on the fnal outcome. Conclusions: We highlight the need for combining denoising and clustering, with adequate choice of stringency parameters, in COI metabarcoding. We present a program that uses the coding properties of this marker to improve the denoising step. We recommend researchers to report their results in terms of both denoised sequences (a proxy for haplotypes) and clusters formed (a proxy for species), and to avoid collapsing the sequences of the latter into a single representative. This will allow studies at the cluster (ideally equating species-level diversity) and at the intra-cluster level, and will ease additivity and comparability between studies. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 2021 2021 2021 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/177185 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/177185 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04115-6 BMC Bioinformatics, 2021, vol. 22, p. 177 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04115-6 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
cc-by (c) Antich, Adrià et al., 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
cc-by (c) Antich, Adrià et al., 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
24 p. application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BioMed Central |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BioMed Central |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals) reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| instname_str |
Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| reponame_str |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| collection |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869425610655268864 |
| score |
15,81155 |