Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm

[ENG]False memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm are explained in terms of the interplay between error-inflating and error-editing (e.g., monitoring) mechanisms. In this study, we focused on disqualifying monitoring, a decision process that helps to reject false memories through th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Cadavid, Sara, Beato Gutiérrez, María Soledad, Suárez Ortega, Mar, Albuquerque, Pedro B.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
Repositorio:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
OAI Identifier:oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/157009
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10366/157009
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:False memories
False recognition
DRM paradigm
Disqualifying monitoring
Memory error-editing processes
Multiple critical lures per list
Backward associative strength
id ES_fde54d041ef7dc341fecaf0accf9f3c8
oai_identifier_str oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/157009
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigmCadavid, SaraBeato Gutiérrez, María SoledadSuárez Ortega, MarAlbuquerque, Pedro B.False memoriesFalse recognitionDRM paradigmDisqualifying monitoringMemory error-editing processesMultiple critical lures per listBackward associative strength[ENG]False memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm are explained in terms of the interplay between error-inflating and error-editing (e.g., monitoring) mechanisms. In this study, we focused on disqualifying monitoring, a decision process that helps to reject false memories through the recollection of collateral information (i.e., recall-to-reject strategies). Participants engage in recall-to-reject strategies using one or two metacognitive processes: (1) applying the logic of mutual exclusivity or (2) experiencing feelings of contrast between studied items and unstudied lures. We aimed to provide, for the first time in the DRM literature, evidence favorable to the existence of a recall-to-reject strategy based on the experience of feelings of contrast. One hundred and forty participants studied six-word DRM lists (e.g., spy, hell, fist, fight, abduction, mortal), simultaneously associated with three critical lures (e.g., WAR, BAD, FEAR). Lists differed in their ease to identify their critical lures (extremely low-BAS lists vs. high-BAS lists). At recognition test, participants saw either one or the three critical lures of the lists. Participants in the three-critical-lure condition were expected to increase their monitoring, as they would experience stronger feelings of contrast than the participants in the one-critical-lure condition. Results supported our hypothesis, showing lower false recognition in the three-critical-lure condition than in the onecritical- lure condition. Critically, in the three-critical-lure condition, participants reduced even more false memory when they could also resort to another monitoring strategy (i.e., identify-to-reject). These findings suggest that, in the DRM context, disqualifying monitoring could be guided by experiencing feelings of contrast between different types of words.Frontiers202420242021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/157009reponame:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamancainstname:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)InglésAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:gredos.usal.es:10366/1570092026-06-07T06:28:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm
title Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm
spellingShingle Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm
Cadavid, Sara
False memories
False recognition
DRM paradigm
Disqualifying monitoring
Memory error-editing processes
Multiple critical lures per list
Backward associative strength
title_short Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm
title_full Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm
title_fullStr Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm
title_full_unstemmed Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm
title_sort Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cadavid, Sara
Beato Gutiérrez, María Soledad
Suárez Ortega, Mar
Albuquerque, Pedro B.
author Cadavid, Sara
author_facet Cadavid, Sara
Beato Gutiérrez, María Soledad
Suárez Ortega, Mar
Albuquerque, Pedro B.
author_role author
author2 Beato Gutiérrez, María Soledad
Suárez Ortega, Mar
Albuquerque, Pedro B.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv False memories
False recognition
DRM paradigm
Disqualifying monitoring
Memory error-editing processes
Multiple critical lures per list
Backward associative strength
topic False memories
False recognition
DRM paradigm
Disqualifying monitoring
Memory error-editing processes
Multiple critical lures per list
Backward associative strength
description [ENG]False memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm are explained in terms of the interplay between error-inflating and error-editing (e.g., monitoring) mechanisms. In this study, we focused on disqualifying monitoring, a decision process that helps to reject false memories through the recollection of collateral information (i.e., recall-to-reject strategies). Participants engage in recall-to-reject strategies using one or two metacognitive processes: (1) applying the logic of mutual exclusivity or (2) experiencing feelings of contrast between studied items and unstudied lures. We aimed to provide, for the first time in the DRM literature, evidence favorable to the existence of a recall-to-reject strategy based on the experience of feelings of contrast. One hundred and forty participants studied six-word DRM lists (e.g., spy, hell, fist, fight, abduction, mortal), simultaneously associated with three critical lures (e.g., WAR, BAD, FEAR). Lists differed in their ease to identify their critical lures (extremely low-BAS lists vs. high-BAS lists). At recognition test, participants saw either one or the three critical lures of the lists. Participants in the three-critical-lure condition were expected to increase their monitoring, as they would experience stronger feelings of contrast than the participants in the one-critical-lure condition. Results supported our hypothesis, showing lower false recognition in the three-critical-lure condition than in the onecritical- lure condition. Critically, in the three-critical-lure condition, participants reduced even more false memory when they could also resort to another monitoring strategy (i.e., identify-to-reject). These findings suggest that, in the DRM context, disqualifying monitoring could be guided by experiencing feelings of contrast between different types of words.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10366/157009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10366/157009
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
instname:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
instname_str Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
reponame_str GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
collection GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869425608360984576
score 15.300719

Similares en LA Referencia