A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: a pilot study
Workflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and user satisf...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10230/54449 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/54449 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Software platform Task analysis Tumor board preparation User satisfaction |
| id |
ES_fddec0f6c47e53443beb221c2cff709f |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:recercat.cat:10230/54449 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: a pilot studyKrupinski, Elizabeth A.Comas Serrano, MercèGarrote Gallego, LeiaSoftware platformTask analysisTumor board preparationUser satisfactionWorkflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and user satisfaction compared to current methods. Using current methods and the NAVIFY Tumor Board Solution, this study assessed the number of tasks and time to prepare tumor board cases. Participants completed online surveys assessing ease of use and satisfaction with current and new platforms. A total of 41 sessions included two surgeons, two oncologists, two pathologists, and two radiologists preparing tumor board cases with 734 tasks were recorded. Overall, there was no difference in the number of tasks using either preparation method (341 current, 393 NAVIFY Tumor Board solution). There was a significant difference in overall preparation time as a function of specialty (F = 71.74, P < 0.0001), with oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons having reduced times with NAVIFY Tumor Board solution compared to the current platform and pathologists having equivalent times. There was a significant difference (F = 38.98, P < 0.0001) for times as a function of task category. Review of clinical course data and other preparation tasks decreased significantly, but pathology and radiology review did not differ significantly. The new platform received higher ratings than the current methods on all survey questions regarding the ease of use and satisfaction. The study supported the hypothesis that the new software platform can improve Tumor Board preparation. Further study is needed to assess the impact of this platform in different hospitals, different data storage systems, with different observers, and different types of Tumor board cases as well as its impact on the quality of the tumor board discussion.Elsevier202220222018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/54449http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésJournal of Pathology Informatics. 2018;9(1):1-7© 2018 Journal of Pathology Informatics. This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10230/544492026-05-29T05:05:01Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: a pilot study |
| title |
A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: a pilot study |
| spellingShingle |
A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: a pilot study Krupinski, Elizabeth A. Software platform Task analysis Tumor board preparation User satisfaction |
| title_short |
A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: a pilot study |
| title_full |
A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: a pilot study |
| title_fullStr |
A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: a pilot study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: a pilot study |
| title_sort |
A new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: a pilot study |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Krupinski, Elizabeth A. Comas Serrano, Mercè Garrote Gallego, Leia |
| author |
Krupinski, Elizabeth A. |
| author_facet |
Krupinski, Elizabeth A. Comas Serrano, Mercè Garrote Gallego, Leia |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Comas Serrano, Mercè Garrote Gallego, Leia |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Software platform Task analysis Tumor board preparation User satisfaction |
| topic |
Software platform Task analysis Tumor board preparation User satisfaction |
| description |
Workflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and user satisfaction compared to current methods. Using current methods and the NAVIFY Tumor Board Solution, this study assessed the number of tasks and time to prepare tumor board cases. Participants completed online surveys assessing ease of use and satisfaction with current and new platforms. A total of 41 sessions included two surgeons, two oncologists, two pathologists, and two radiologists preparing tumor board cases with 734 tasks were recorded. Overall, there was no difference in the number of tasks using either preparation method (341 current, 393 NAVIFY Tumor Board solution). There was a significant difference in overall preparation time as a function of specialty (F = 71.74, P < 0.0001), with oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons having reduced times with NAVIFY Tumor Board solution compared to the current platform and pathologists having equivalent times. There was a significant difference (F = 38.98, P < 0.0001) for times as a function of task category. Review of clinical course data and other preparation tasks decreased significantly, but pathology and radiology review did not differ significantly. The new platform received higher ratings than the current methods on all survey questions regarding the ease of use and satisfaction. The study supported the hypothesis that the new software platform can improve Tumor Board preparation. Further study is needed to assess the impact of this platform in different hospitals, different data storage systems, with different observers, and different types of Tumor board cases as well as its impact on the quality of the tumor board discussion. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 2022 2022 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/54449 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/54449 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Pathology Informatics. 2018;9(1):1-7 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| instname_str |
Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| reponame_str |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| collection |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869425606024757248 |
| score |
15.812429 |