Continuous Glucose Monitoring Time-in-Range and HbA(1c) Targets in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes

The CONCEPTT trial compared real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) to capillary glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. We analyzed CGM and glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) measures in first (n = 221), second (n = 197), and third (n = 172) trimesters, aiming to examine targ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Tundidor, D, Meek, CL, Yamamoto, J, Martinez-Bru, C, Gich, I, Feig, DS, Murphy, HR, Corcoy, R
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
Repositorio:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
OAI Identifier:oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p4672
Acceso en línea:https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=4672
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573793
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Continuous glucose monitoring
Type 1 diabetes
Pregnancy
HbA(1c) target
Time in range
Descripción
Sumario:The CONCEPTT trial compared real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) to capillary glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. We analyzed CGM and glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) measures in first (n = 221), second (n = 197), and third (n = 172) trimesters, aiming to examine target glucose attainment and associations with pregnancy outcomes. CGM targets were Time-in-range (TIR) > 70%, Time-above-range (TAR) <25%, and Time-below-range (TBR) < 4%, and HbA(1c) targets < 6.5% (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE]) and HbA(1c) < 6.0% in second and third trimesters (American Diabetes Association [ADA]). TIR/TAR/TBR targets were achieved by 7.7/14.5/30.3% participants in first, 10.2/14.2/52.8% in second, and 35.5/37.2/52.9% in third trimesters. CGM target attainment was low but increased during pregnancy and with RT-CGM use. In the adjusted analyses, achieving TBR target was associated with a higher risk of pre-eclampsia and neonatal hypoglycemia. ADA HbA(1c) target attainment was low and unchanged during pregnancy (23.5/27.9/23.8%) but increased with RT-CGM use. In the adjusted analyses, HbA(1c) target attainment was associated with a lower risk of preterm birth, large-for-gestational age and neonatal hypoglycemia. We conclude that CONCEPTT trial participants had a low rate of CGM and of HbA(1c) target attainment. Attainment of CGM and NICE HbA(1c) targets increased throughout gestation and all targets (both NICE/ADA HbA(1c) and CGM) were more likely to be achieved by RT-CGM users, at 34 weeks' gestation. ADA HbA(1c) target achievement was independently associated with better perinatal outcomes, while the independent association of TBR target achievement with increased risk warrants further study. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Identifier NCT01788527.