Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database

Virtually all rankings of journals are based on citations, including self citations by journals and individual academics. The gold standard for bibliometric rankings based on citations data is the widely-used Thomson Reuters Web of Science (2014) citations database, which publishes, among others, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Chang, Chia-Lin, McAleer, Michael
Tipo de recurso: informe técnico
Fecha de publicación:2015
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/27531
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/27531
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:C18
C81
Y10
Research assessment measures
Impact factors
Bibliometric measures.
Econometría (Economía)
5302 Econometría
id ES_fc0ba10a9debb4e3ab8182ba27bf8552
oai_identifier_str oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/27531
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations DatabaseChang, Chia-LinMcAleer, MichaelC18C81Y10Research assessment measuresImpact factorsBibliometric measures.Econometría (Economía)5302 EconometríaVirtually all rankings of journals are based on citations, including self citations by journals and individual academics. The gold standard for bibliometric rankings based on citations data is the widely-used Thomson Reuters Web of Science (2014) citations database, which publishes, among others, the celebrated Impact Factor. However, there are numerous bibliometric measures, also known as research assessment measures, based on the Thomson Reuters citations database, but they do not all seem to have been collected in a single source. The purpose of this paper is to present, define and compare the 16 most well-known Thomson Reuters bibliometric measures in a single source. It is important that the existing bibliometric measures be presented in any rankings papers as alternative bibliometric measures based on the Thomson Reuters citations database can and do produce different rankings, as has been documented in a number of papers in the bibliometrics literature.Universidad Complutense de Madrid20152015-03-0120152015-03-01technical reporthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ghinfo:eu-repo/semantics/reportapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/27531reponame:Docta Complutenseinstname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/275312026-06-02T12:44:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database
title Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database
spellingShingle Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database
Chang, Chia-Lin
C18
C81
Y10
Research assessment measures
Impact factors
Bibliometric measures.
Econometría (Economía)
5302 Econometría
title_short Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database
title_full Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database
title_fullStr Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database
title_sort Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chang, Chia-Lin
McAleer, Michael
author Chang, Chia-Lin
author_facet Chang, Chia-Lin
McAleer, Michael
author_role author
author2 McAleer, Michael
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv C18
C81
Y10
Research assessment measures
Impact factors
Bibliometric measures.
Econometría (Economía)
5302 Econometría
topic C18
C81
Y10
Research assessment measures
Impact factors
Bibliometric measures.
Econometría (Economía)
5302 Econometría
description Virtually all rankings of journals are based on citations, including self citations by journals and individual academics. The gold standard for bibliometric rankings based on citations data is the widely-used Thomson Reuters Web of Science (2014) citations database, which publishes, among others, the celebrated Impact Factor. However, there are numerous bibliometric measures, also known as research assessment measures, based on the Thomson Reuters citations database, but they do not all seem to have been collected in a single source. The purpose of this paper is to present, define and compare the 16 most well-known Thomson Reuters bibliometric measures in a single source. It is important that the existing bibliometric measures be presented in any rankings papers as alternative bibliometric measures based on the Thomson Reuters citations database can and do produce different rankings, as has been documented in a number of papers in the bibliometrics literature.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2015-03-01
2015
2015-03-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv technical report
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
format report
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/27531
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/27531
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Docta Complutense
instname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
instname_str Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
reponame_str Docta Complutense
collection Docta Complutense
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869425385807020032
score 15,811543