Protective role of extracellular vesicles against oxidative DNA damage

Background: Oxidative stress, a source of genotoxic damage, is often the underlying mechanism in many functional cell disorders. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been shown to be key regulators of cellular processes and may be involved in maintaining cellular redox balance. Herein, we aimed to deve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ribas Maynou, Jordi, Parra, Ana, Martínez-Díaz, Pablo, Peres Rubio, Camila, Lucas, Xiomara, Yeste Oliveras, Marc, Roca, Jordi, Barranco, Isabel
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10256/27187
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10256/27187
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:ADN -- Dany
DNA damage
Espermatozoides -- Investigació
Spermatozoa -- Research
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Oxidative stress, a source of genotoxic damage, is often the underlying mechanism in many functional cell disorders. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been shown to be key regulators of cellular processes and may be involved in maintaining cellular redox balance. Herein, we aimed to develop a method to assess the effects of EVs on DNA oxidation using porcine seminal plasma extracellular vesicles (sEVs). Results: The technique was set using a cell-free plasmid DNA to avoid the bias generated by the uptake of sEVs by sperm cells, employing increasing concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) that generate DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs). Because SSBs contain a free 3'-OH end that allow the extension through quantitative PCR, such extension -and therefore the SYBR intensity- showed to be proportional to the amount of SSB. In the next stage, H2O2 was co-incubated with two size-differentiated subpopulations (small and large) of permeabilized and non-permeabilized sEVs to assess whether the intravesicular content (IC) or the surface of sEVs protects the DNA from oxidative damage. Results obtained showed that the surface of small sEVs reduced the incidence of DNA SSBs (P < 0.05), whereas that of large sEVs had no impact on the generation of SSBs (P > 0.05). The IC showed no protective effect against DNA oxidation (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that the surface of small sEVs, including the peripheral corona layer, may exert a protective function against alterations that are originated by oxidative mechanisms. In addition, our in vitro study opens path to detect, localize and quantify the protective effects against oxidation of extracellular vesicles derived from different fluids, elucidating their function in physiopathological states