A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study)

Background: Patient access to orphan medicinal products (OMPs) is limited and varies between countries, reimbursement decisions on OMPs are complex, and there is a need for more transparent processes to know which criteria should be considered to inform these decisions. This study aimed to determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: de Andrés-Nogales F., Cruz E., Calleja M.Á., Delgado O., Gorgas M.Q., Espín J., Mestre-Ferrándiz J., Palau F., Ancochea A., Arce R., Domínguez-Hernández R., Casado M.Á., Gómez Pajuelo P., Gorgas Torner M.Q., López Andrés A., López Rodríguez M., Marín Ballvé A., Martín Herranz M.I., Morell Baladrón A., Sánchez Martínez F.I., Antoñanzas F., Bonanad S., Caballero T., Cabasés J.M., Cruz J., García-Goñi M., Gil R., Pajuelo P.G., Torner M.Q.G., Andrés A.L., Rodríguez M.L., Ballvé A.M., Herranz M.I.M., Baladrón A.M., Mur C., Machado M.P., Martínez F.I.S., Santos A.R., Suárez M., Trillo J.L., the FinMHU-MCDA Group
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Zaragoza
Repositorio:Zaguán. Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Zaragoza
OAI Identifier:oai:zaguan.unizar.es:110786
Acceso en línea:http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/110786
Access Level:acceso abierto
id ES_f9d2cd60dcba08bd70eea789009229fb
oai_identifier_str oai:zaguan.unizar.es:110786
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study)de Andrés-Nogales F.Cruz E.Calleja M.Á.Delgado O.Gorgas M.Q.Espín J.Mestre-Ferrándiz J.Palau F.Ancochea A.Arce R.Domínguez-Hernández R.Casado M.Á.Gómez Pajuelo P.Gorgas Torner M.Q.López Andrés A.López Rodríguez M.Marín Ballvé A.Martín Herranz M.I.Morell Baladrón A.Sánchez Martínez F.I.Ancochea A.Antoñanzas F.Bonanad S.Cruz E.Caballero T.Cabasés J.M.Calleja M.Á.Cruz J.Delgado O.Espín J.García-Goñi M.Gil R.Pajuelo P.G.Torner M.Q.G.Andrés A.L.Rodríguez M.L.Ballvé A.M.Herranz M.I.M.Mestre-Ferrándiz J.Baladrón A.M.Mur C.Palau F.Machado M.P.Martínez F.I.S.Santos A.R.Suárez M.Trillo J.L.the FinMHU-MCDA GroupBackground: Patient access to orphan medicinal products (OMPs) is limited and varies between countries, reimbursement decisions on OMPs are complex, and there is a need for more transparent processes to know which criteria should be considered to inform these decisions. This study aimed to determine the most relevant criteria for the reimbursement of OMPs in Spain, from a multi-stakeholder perspective, and using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). Methods: An MCDA was developed in 3 phases and included 28 stakeholders closely related to the field of rare diseases (6 physicians, 5 hospital pharmacists, 7 health economists, 4 patient representatives and 6 members from national and regional health authorities). Initially [phase A], a bibliographic review was conducted to identify the potential reimbursement criteria. Then, a reduced advisory board (8 members) proposed, selected, and defined the final list of criteria that could be relevant for reimbursement. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) [phase B] was developed to determine the relevance and relative importance weight of such criteria according to the stakeholders’ preferences by choosing between pairs of hypothetical financing scenarios. A multinomial logit model was fitted to analyze the DCE responses. Finally [phase C], the advisory board review the results using a deliberative process. Results: Thirteen criteria were selected, related to 4 dimensions: patient population, disease, treatment, and economic evaluation. Nine criteria were deemed relevant for decision-making and associated with a higher relative importance: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) (23.53%), treatment efficacy (14.64%), availability of treatment alternatives (13.51%), disease severity (12.62%), avoided costs (11.21%), age of target population (7.75%), safety (seriousness of adverse events) (4.72%), quality of evidence (3.82%) and size of target population (3.12%). The remaining criteria had a < 3% relative importance: economic burden of disease (2.50%), cost of treatment (1.73%), cost-effectiveness (0.83%) and safety (frequency of adverse events) (0.03%). Conclusion: The reimbursement of OMPs in Spain should be determined by its effect on patient’s HRQL, the extent of its therapeutic benefit from efficacy and the availability of other therapeutic options. Furthermore, the severity of the rare disease should also influence the decision along with the potential of the treatment to avoid associated costs.2021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://zaguan.unizar.es/record/110786reponame:Zaguán. Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Zaragozainstname:Universidad de ZaragozaInglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:zaguan.unizar.es:1107862026-05-29T13:59:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study)
title A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study)
spellingShingle A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study)
de Andrés-Nogales F.
title_short A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study)
title_full A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study)
title_fullStr A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study)
title_full_unstemmed A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study)
title_sort A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv de Andrés-Nogales F.
Cruz E.
Calleja M.Á.
Delgado O.
Gorgas M.Q.
Espín J.
Mestre-Ferrándiz J.
Palau F.
Ancochea A.
Arce R.
Domínguez-Hernández R.
Casado M.Á.
Gómez Pajuelo P.
Gorgas Torner M.Q.
López Andrés A.
López Rodríguez M.
Marín Ballvé A.
Martín Herranz M.I.
Morell Baladrón A.
Sánchez Martínez F.I.
Ancochea A.
Antoñanzas F.
Bonanad S.
Cruz E.
Caballero T.
Cabasés J.M.
Calleja M.Á.
Cruz J.
Delgado O.
Espín J.
García-Goñi M.
Gil R.
Pajuelo P.G.
Torner M.Q.G.
Andrés A.L.
Rodríguez M.L.
Ballvé A.M.
Herranz M.I.M.
Mestre-Ferrándiz J.
Baladrón A.M.
Mur C.
Palau F.
Machado M.P.
Martínez F.I.S.
Santos A.R.
Suárez M.
Trillo J.L.
the FinMHU-MCDA Group
author de Andrés-Nogales F.
author_facet de Andrés-Nogales F.
Cruz E.
Calleja M.Á.
Delgado O.
Gorgas M.Q.
Espín J.
Mestre-Ferrándiz J.
Palau F.
Ancochea A.
Arce R.
Domínguez-Hernández R.
Casado M.Á.
Gómez Pajuelo P.
Gorgas Torner M.Q.
López Andrés A.
López Rodríguez M.
Marín Ballvé A.
Martín Herranz M.I.
Morell Baladrón A.
Sánchez Martínez F.I.
Antoñanzas F.
Bonanad S.
Caballero T.
Cabasés J.M.
Cruz J.
García-Goñi M.
Gil R.
Pajuelo P.G.
Torner M.Q.G.
Andrés A.L.
Rodríguez M.L.
Ballvé A.M.
Herranz M.I.M.
Baladrón A.M.
Mur C.
Machado M.P.
Martínez F.I.S.
Santos A.R.
Suárez M.
Trillo J.L.
the FinMHU-MCDA Group
author_role author
author2 Cruz E.
Calleja M.Á.
Delgado O.
Gorgas M.Q.
Espín J.
Mestre-Ferrándiz J.
Palau F.
Ancochea A.
Arce R.
Domínguez-Hernández R.
Casado M.Á.
Gómez Pajuelo P.
Gorgas Torner M.Q.
López Andrés A.
López Rodríguez M.
Marín Ballvé A.
Martín Herranz M.I.
Morell Baladrón A.
Sánchez Martínez F.I.
Antoñanzas F.
Bonanad S.
Caballero T.
Cabasés J.M.
Cruz J.
García-Goñi M.
Gil R.
Pajuelo P.G.
Torner M.Q.G.
Andrés A.L.
Rodríguez M.L.
Ballvé A.M.
Herranz M.I.M.
Baladrón A.M.
Mur C.
Machado M.P.
Martínez F.I.S.
Santos A.R.
Suárez M.
Trillo J.L.
the FinMHU-MCDA Group
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
description Background: Patient access to orphan medicinal products (OMPs) is limited and varies between countries, reimbursement decisions on OMPs are complex, and there is a need for more transparent processes to know which criteria should be considered to inform these decisions. This study aimed to determine the most relevant criteria for the reimbursement of OMPs in Spain, from a multi-stakeholder perspective, and using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). Methods: An MCDA was developed in 3 phases and included 28 stakeholders closely related to the field of rare diseases (6 physicians, 5 hospital pharmacists, 7 health economists, 4 patient representatives and 6 members from national and regional health authorities). Initially [phase A], a bibliographic review was conducted to identify the potential reimbursement criteria. Then, a reduced advisory board (8 members) proposed, selected, and defined the final list of criteria that could be relevant for reimbursement. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) [phase B] was developed to determine the relevance and relative importance weight of such criteria according to the stakeholders’ preferences by choosing between pairs of hypothetical financing scenarios. A multinomial logit model was fitted to analyze the DCE responses. Finally [phase C], the advisory board review the results using a deliberative process. Results: Thirteen criteria were selected, related to 4 dimensions: patient population, disease, treatment, and economic evaluation. Nine criteria were deemed relevant for decision-making and associated with a higher relative importance: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) (23.53%), treatment efficacy (14.64%), availability of treatment alternatives (13.51%), disease severity (12.62%), avoided costs (11.21%), age of target population (7.75%), safety (seriousness of adverse events) (4.72%), quality of evidence (3.82%) and size of target population (3.12%). The remaining criteria had a < 3% relative importance: economic burden of disease (2.50%), cost of treatment (1.73%), cost-effectiveness (0.83%) and safety (frequency of adverse events) (0.03%). Conclusion: The reimbursement of OMPs in Spain should be determined by its effect on patient’s HRQL, the extent of its therapeutic benefit from efficacy and the availability of other therapeutic options. Furthermore, the severity of the rare disease should also influence the decision along with the potential of the treatment to avoid associated costs.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/110786
url http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/110786
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv
publisher.none.fl_str_mv
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Zaguán. Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Zaragoza
instname:Universidad de Zaragoza
instname_str Universidad de Zaragoza
reponame_str Zaguán. Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Zaragoza
collection Zaguán. Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Zaragoza
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869425129100935168
score 15.301603