A novel abbreviated version of the Luria neuropsychological diagnosis battery: reliability and convergent validity in Spanish older adults

[EN]Objective: To estimate the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the new Spanish abbreviated version of the Luria Neuropsychological Diagnosis (DNA-2) battery for older adults. Method: A total of thirty cognitively healthy volunteers were examined in this study. The partici pants completed...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Alzola, Patricia, Buch Vicente, Bárbara, Sazatornil, Jaime, Puertas Martín, Verónica, Fernández-Calvo, Bernardino, Sánchez Benavides, Gonzalo, Rueda Revé, Laura, Ramos Campos, Francisco, Villarejo Galende, Alberto, Contador Castillo, Israel
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
Repositorio:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:gredos______::be97307a27ad4cc18cd4e1870bf4b801
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10366/171558
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Neuropsychology
Luria’s model
Cognitive assessment
Older adults
Psychometrics
Descrição
Resumo:[EN]Objective: To estimate the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the new Spanish abbreviated version of the Luria Neuropsychological Diagnosis (DNA-2) battery for older adults. Method: A total of thirty cognitively healthy volunteers were examined in this study. The partici pants completed a comprehensive standardized assessment, encompassing cognitive and func tional performance. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to examine test-retest and inter-rater reliability. One month was allowed between administrations. Furthermore, correlations between Luria DNA-2 (total and domain subscores) and other classical cognitive measures were explored. Results: The test-retest reliability on the overall Luria DNA-2 score was high (ICC= .834, 95% CI [.680, .917], p < .001). Furthermore, the inter-rater reliability for the total score demonstrated an excellent concordance between administrators (ICC= .990, 95% CI [.979, .995], p < .001). Positive and significant correlations were observed between Luria DNA-2 (both total and domain sub scores) and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-III; ρ = .857, p < .001). Conclusions: This study supports the adequate reliability of the Luria DNA-2, as an abbreviated neuropsychological battery, for assessing cognitive performance in Spaniards aged 55 years and older. Future studies should continue to explore the psychometric properties of the Luria DNA-2, particularly those related to its diagnostic validity for early detection of cognitive impairment.