Deixis and person in Ibero- and Gallo-Romance demonstratives

Demonstratives in Romance languages display greater morphological complexity than the definite articles that developed from them, illuminating the internal structure of both sets of forms. Building on the work of Leu (2015), Bernstein et al. (1999), and others, we claim that Ibero- and Gallo-Romance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ordoñez, Francisco|||0000-0002-1845-4444, Bernstein, Judy, Roca, Francesc|||0000-0001-9186-4899
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:317448
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/317448
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5565/rev/isogloss.518
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Demonstratives
Determiners
Ibero-romance
Gallo-romance
Grammaticalization
Descripción
Sumario:Demonstratives in Romance languages display greater morphological complexity than the definite articles that developed from them, illuminating the internal structure of both sets of forms. Building on the work of Leu (2015), Bernstein et al. (1999), and others, we claim that Ibero- and Gallo-Romance demonstratives can be decomposed into a deictic or locative component and a definite determiner, and that an agreement relation involving person connects these two heads (cf. Guardiano & Stavrou 2020). Compared with their Latin precursors, which displayed a three-way system (1st/proximal, 2nd/medial, 3rd/distal), the modern Romance forms are relatively unstable: a loss of forms through grammaticalization is followed by a gain through realignment or addition of forms. Our analysis also builds on the ideas that the D head encodes person (Bernstein 2008a,b; Longobardi 2008) and that Romance demonstrative systems are person-oriented (Vincent 1999; Ledgeway 2015; Terenghi 2023). When a definite determiner is decoupled from its demonstrative source, as happened across Romance in its transition from Latin, it retains its person feature and loses its deictic force, which it subsequently regains.