LE CORBUSIER Y LA GRILLE CLIMATIQUE. Herramientas para la inclusión de variables termodinámicas y sensoriales en el proyecto arquitectónico
[EN] Today, it is well stablished that there is a need to reduce energetic consumption among different human activities and also in buildings; the rhythm of today's waste is no longer acceptable for the planet in terms of sustainability. The degree of comfort to which we have get used to, a...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis doctoral |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/62412 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/62412 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Le Corbusier Grille climatique Confort Temperatura Higrotermia Percepción sensorial Herramientas gráficas EXPRESION GRAFICA ARQUITECTONICA |
| Sumario: | [EN] Today, it is well stablished that there is a need to reduce energetic consumption among different human activities and also in buildings; the rhythm of today's waste is no longer acceptable for the planet in terms of sustainability. The degree of comfort to which we have get used to, and to which society does not seem to renounce, places in the focus of the problem. Comfort is a very wide concept that includes the perception of multiple ambient parameters, but in relation to the problems exposed, we will focus on higrothermal and daylight approaches. In that sense, architects cannot ignore this reality, so it is appropriate to deal with it since the very beginning of the architectural project from a holistic point of view. Mostly, when recent researches demonstrate that the decisions taken in the early design phases have influence over the 80% of the building's energy performance. Spanning from the Renaissance to nowadays, along three centuries, the modern era comprises a period with huge human development. Even though, it has two common parameters in cultural terms; it has been -and still is¿a culture of projects and it is also steeped in the hegemony of visual. The prevailing oculocentrism makes that image and objects as a consumer product, perceived through the eye, have focused design parameters. Architecture, whether as a result or a contextual engine, has not been foreign to these two realities. Only departing from the avant-garde movements of the past century, it is possible to find examples of intentional sensibility towards the environment and other less material issues, for instance comfort, especially in the second generation of the fifties and the sixties. With the growing use of "fenomenology" and "hapticity" when describing inhabited environments, new variables come into play. Architects, acting as planners conceiving the places where people live, have not been able to introduce these matters in everyday tasks. All that we perceive through our sensory channels is much more than just what we see, so it seems, that in some way, it needs to take its place in the design processes. In addition, as stated by Ortega y Gasset, the higher degree of technification of the milieu appears to have led us to a thoughtless and empty adaptation of the system of instrumental rationality. The trust in technology as the only way to solve human problems is an argument that is losing strength with the passing of the 21st century. Peter Collins believed that the study of how people built in the past is completely different to the study of how they do it today yet indivisible. Based on this approach and taking into account all said before, Le Corbusier's architectural project is studied from the higrothermal and sensory perspective, as well as the Grille Climatique, tool developed in his atelier at the early fifties to control these areas. The techniques available at our time -analysis, simulation, monitoring and user perception - are used to demonstrate the system adequacy and possible future applications. Conclusions will be drawn through contrast with other tools developed later and comparison between Pavillon Suisse and Maison du Brésil, designed before and after the Grille Climatique, searching to what extent Le Corbusier took into account certain intangible variables in the design process. |
|---|