Why do certain primary health care teams respond better to intimate partner violence than others? A multiple case study

Objective: To analyse how team level conditions influenced health care professionals’ responses to inti-mate partner violence.Methods: We used a multiple embedded case study. The cases were four primary health care teamslocated in a southern region of Spain; two of them considered “good” and two s “...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Goicolea, Isabel, Marchal, Bruno, Hurtig, Anna-Karin, Vives Cases, Carmen, Briones Vozmediano, Erica Tula, San Sebastián, Miguel
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/62326
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.10.005
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/62326
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Intimate partner violence
Primary health care team
Women-centred care
Case study
id ES_f675a2810866ea273d2bea0ae9047ffc
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/62326
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why do certain primary health care teams respond better to intimate partner violence than others? A multiple case study
¿Por qué ciertos equipos de atención primaria de salud responden mejor a la violencia de compañero íntimo? Un estudio de casos múltiples
title Why do certain primary health care teams respond better to intimate partner violence than others? A multiple case study
spellingShingle Why do certain primary health care teams respond better to intimate partner violence than others? A multiple case study
Goicolea, Isabel
Intimate partner violence
Primary health care team
Women-centred care
Case study
title_short Why do certain primary health care teams respond better to intimate partner violence than others? A multiple case study
title_full Why do certain primary health care teams respond better to intimate partner violence than others? A multiple case study
title_fullStr Why do certain primary health care teams respond better to intimate partner violence than others? A multiple case study
title_full_unstemmed Why do certain primary health care teams respond better to intimate partner violence than others? A multiple case study
title_sort Why do certain primary health care teams respond better to intimate partner violence than others? A multiple case study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Goicolea, Isabel
Marchal, Bruno
Hurtig, Anna-Karin
Vives Cases, Carmen
Briones Vozmediano, Erica Tula
San Sebastián, Miguel
author Goicolea, Isabel
author_facet Goicolea, Isabel
Marchal, Bruno
Hurtig, Anna-Karin
Vives Cases, Carmen
Briones Vozmediano, Erica Tula
San Sebastián, Miguel
author_role author
author2 Marchal, Bruno
Hurtig, Anna-Karin
Vives Cases, Carmen
Briones Vozmediano, Erica Tula
San Sebastián, Miguel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Intimate partner violence
Primary health care team
Women-centred care
Case study
topic Intimate partner violence
Primary health care team
Women-centred care
Case study
description Objective: To analyse how team level conditions influenced health care professionals’ responses to inti-mate partner violence.Methods: We used a multiple embedded case study. The cases were four primary health care teamslocated in a southern region of Spain; two of them considered “good” and two s “average”. The twoteams considered good had scored highest in practice issues for intimate partner violence, measured viaa questionnaire (PREMIS - Physicians Readiness to Respond to Intimate Partner Violence Survey) appliedto professionals working in the four primary health care teams. In each case quantitative and qualitativedata were collected using a social network questionnaire, interviews and observations.Results: The two “good” cases showed dynamics and structures that promoted team working and teamlearning on intimate partner violence, had committed social workers and an enabling environment fortheir work, and had put into practice explicit strategies to implement a women-centred approach.Conclusions: Better individual responses to intimate partner violence were implemented in the teamswhich: 1) had social workers who were knowledgeable and motivated to engage with others; 2) sustaineda structure of regular meetings during which issues of violence were discussed; 3) encouraged a friendlyteam climate; and 4) implemented concrete actions towards women-centred care.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.10.005
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/62326
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.10.005
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/62326
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.10.005
Gaceta Sanitaria, 2017, vol. 33, núm. 2, p. 169-176
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2017
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2017
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869424764779495424
spelling Why do certain primary health care teams respond better to intimate partner violence than others? A multiple case study¿Por qué ciertos equipos de atención primaria de salud responden mejor a la violencia de compañero íntimo? Un estudio de casos múltiplesGoicolea, IsabelMarchal, BrunoHurtig, Anna-KarinVives Cases, CarmenBriones Vozmediano, Erica TulaSan Sebastián, MiguelIntimate partner violencePrimary health care teamWomen-centred careCase studyObjective: To analyse how team level conditions influenced health care professionals’ responses to inti-mate partner violence.Methods: We used a multiple embedded case study. The cases were four primary health care teamslocated in a southern region of Spain; two of them considered “good” and two s “average”. The twoteams considered good had scored highest in practice issues for intimate partner violence, measured viaa questionnaire (PREMIS - Physicians Readiness to Respond to Intimate Partner Violence Survey) appliedto professionals working in the four primary health care teams. In each case quantitative and qualitativedata were collected using a social network questionnaire, interviews and observations.Results: The two “good” cases showed dynamics and structures that promoted team working and teamlearning on intimate partner violence, had committed social workers and an enabling environment fortheir work, and had put into practice explicit strategies to implement a women-centred approach.Conclusions: Better individual responses to intimate partner violence were implemented in the teamswhich: 1) had social workers who were knowledgeable and motivated to engage with others; 2) sustaineda structure of regular meetings during which issues of violence were discussed; 3) encouraged a friendlyteam climate; and 4) implemented concrete actions towards women-centred care.Objetivo: Analizar cómo las condiciones del equipo influyen en las respuestas de los/las profesionalessanitarios a la violencia de compa˜nero íntimo.Método: Se realizó un estudio de casos múltiples. Los casos fueron cuatro equipos de atención primariade salud ubicados en una región del sur de Espa˜na. Dos de ellos se calificaron como «buenos» y otros doscomo «promedio». Se calificaron como «buenos» los dos equipos con puntuaciones más altas en prácticasen cuanto a violencia de compa˜nero íntimo, medidas a través de un cuestionario (PREMIS, cuestionarioque mide la capacidad de respuesta de los/las médicos) que se aplicó a profesionales de los cuatro equipos.En cada caso se recolectaron datos cuantitativos y cualitativos mediante un cuestionario de redes sociales,entrevistas y observaciones.Resultados: Los dos casos «buenos» presentaban dinámicas y estructuras que promovían el aprendizajey el trabajo en equipo en el tema de violencia de compa˜nero íntimo, contaban con trabajadoras socialescomprometidas con el tema y un ambiente que les permitía desarrollar su trabajo, y habían puesto enpráctica de manera explícita estrategias para ofrecer una atención centrada en las mujeres.Conclusiones: Los equipos que respondieron mejor a la violencia de pareja fueron aquellos que: 1) tienentrabajadoras sociales bien informadas y motivadas para involucrar a otros/as; 2) mantienen una estruc-tura de reuniones regulares en las que se aborda el tema de la violencia; 3) promueven un buen ambientede trabajo; y 4) desarrollan acciones concretas para ofrecer una atención centrada en las mujeres.This study has been funded through a COFAS grant (supported by COFUND action within the Marie Curie Action People, in the Seventh Framework programme and the Swedish Council for WorkingLife and Social Research/FAS-Forskningsradet för arbetsliv ochsocialvetenskap) through a competitive call. This work was partly supported by the Umeå Center for Global Health Research, fundedby FAS, the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research(Grant no. 2006-1512).Elsevier2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.10.005http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/62326reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.10.005Gaceta Sanitaria, 2017, vol. 33, núm. 2, p. 169-176cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/623262026-05-29T05:05:01Z
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia