Advancing the understanding of forest conservation dynamics through livelihood and landscape change scenarios

Forest conversion and conservation in rural settings are linked to both social and biophysical drivers. However, the joint analysis of these drivers presents methodological challenges. To address this problem, we propose a novel methodology to explore the relationship between livelihood heterogeneit...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Alfonso-Bécares, Diana|||0000-0003-1264-1967, Giampietro, Mario|||0000-0002-5569-7023, Corbera, Esteve|||0000-0001-7970-4411, Serrano-Tovar, Tarik|||0000-0003-2748-5987
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2024
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositório:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:273340
Acesso em linha:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/273340
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1007/s10668-023-02965-z
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Forest conservation
Archetypes
Conservation policy
Livelihoods
Scenarios
Rural systems
Descrição
Resumo:Forest conversion and conservation in rural settings are linked to both social and biophysical drivers. However, the joint analysis of these drivers presents methodological challenges. To address this problem, we propose a novel methodology to explore the relationship between livelihood heterogeneity and land use change at the community level. It combines the concept of archetype with the accounting scheme of MUlti-Scale Integrated Analysis of Societal and Ecosystem Metabolism to define and quantify the characteristics of livelihood typologies in socioeconomic (time use, financial flows) and ecological terms (land use, agricultural inputs, soil degradation). Conservation trade-offs of potential policies are explored through "what if" scenarios assuming changes in off-farm opportunities, population growth, and conservation/farming subsidies. The approach is tested with a case study of the community of San Isidro, in Chiapas, Mexico. We conclude that the concept of livelihood typologies is useful to inform the debate over conservation prospects in rural environments.