Clinical and radiographic evaluation for two crestal sinus lift techniques: osteotome versus osseodensification. a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Purpose: Maxillary sinus floor elevation is a safe and effective surgical technique for achieving vertical bone height, performed through either a lateral or crestal approach. The latter includes both the osteotome technique and osseodensification. The aim of this systematic review was to compare th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Cobo Vázquez, Carlos, García-Rodríguez, Sonia, Colmenares-Otero, María Eugenia, Sáez-Alcaide, Luis Miguel, Cortés Bretón Brinkmann, Jorge, Madrigal Martínez-Pereda, Cristina María, Meniz García, Cristina María
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/120538
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/120538
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:616.314-089.843:612.753
Crestal sinus lift
Maxillary sinus lift
Osseodensification
Osteotome
Odontología (Odontología)
Cirugía bucofacial
Implantes dentales
Sistema musculoesquelético
Diagnóstico por imagen y medicina nuclear
3299 Otras Especialidades Médicas
3213.04 Cirugía de Huesos
2209.90 Tratamiento Digital. Imágenes
id ES_f51c568a693c73f331eabcd53ec3a7f9
oai_identifier_str oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/120538
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical and radiographic evaluation for two crestal sinus lift techniques: osteotome versus osseodensification. a systematic review and meta‐analysisCobo Vázquez, CarlosGarcía-Rodríguez, SoniaColmenares-Otero, María EugeniaSáez-Alcaide, Luis MiguelCortés Bretón Brinkmann, JorgeMadrigal Martínez-Pereda, Cristina MaríaMeniz García, Cristina María616.314-089.843:612.753Crestal sinus liftMaxillary sinus liftOsseodensificationOsteotomeOdontología (Odontología)Cirugía bucofacialImplantes dentalesSistema musculoesqueléticoDiagnóstico por imagen y medicina nuclear3299 Otras Especialidades Médicas3213.04 Cirugía de Huesos2209.90 Tratamiento Digital. ImágenesPurpose: Maxillary sinus floor elevation is a safe and effective surgical technique for achieving vertical bone height, performed through either a lateral or crestal approach. The latter includes both the osteotome technique and osseodensification. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the outcomes of the classic crestal sinus lift technique and the osseodensification sinus lift approach in terms of the bone gain, marginal bone loss, survival rate, follow-up time and complications. Methods: This review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was conducted across three databases: (1) The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed); (2) SCOPUS; and (3) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and the Cochrane Collaboration tool for evaluating risk of bias. A meta-analysis for random effects was carried out for implant survival, residual bone height and bone gain. Results: Thirteen studies were included, ten studies performed the osteotome (OST) approach and three performed the osseodensification (OD) approach, with a total of 519 sites treated. The residual bone height was 5.94 and 5.00 mm for OD and OST, respectively. For bone gain, similar results were found for both groups, being 3.37 mm for OD and 3.18 mm for OST. For both groups, the most used diameter and length of the implant was 4 and 10 mm, respectively, and the implant survival rates ranged from 94.1% to 100%. OST technique reflected a complication rate of 14.32%, compared to the OD technique, which showed a complication rate of 2.78%. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the maxillary sinus lift by osseodesinfication approach is a safe, predictable and successful technique compared to the osteotome approach, with similar outcomes regarding bone gain which is an important parameter for implant placement.SpringerUniversidad Complutense de Madrid20252025-01-0120252025-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/120538reponame:Docta Complutenseinstname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/1205382026-06-02T12:44:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical and radiographic evaluation for two crestal sinus lift techniques: osteotome versus osseodensification. a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Clinical and radiographic evaluation for two crestal sinus lift techniques: osteotome versus osseodensification. a systematic review and meta‐analysis
spellingShingle Clinical and radiographic evaluation for two crestal sinus lift techniques: osteotome versus osseodensification. a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Cobo Vázquez, Carlos
616.314-089.843:612.753
Crestal sinus lift
Maxillary sinus lift
Osseodensification
Osteotome
Odontología (Odontología)
Cirugía bucofacial
Implantes dentales
Sistema musculoesquelético
Diagnóstico por imagen y medicina nuclear
3299 Otras Especialidades Médicas
3213.04 Cirugía de Huesos
2209.90 Tratamiento Digital. Imágenes
title_short Clinical and radiographic evaluation for two crestal sinus lift techniques: osteotome versus osseodensification. a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Clinical and radiographic evaluation for two crestal sinus lift techniques: osteotome versus osseodensification. a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Clinical and radiographic evaluation for two crestal sinus lift techniques: osteotome versus osseodensification. a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and radiographic evaluation for two crestal sinus lift techniques: osteotome versus osseodensification. a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort Clinical and radiographic evaluation for two crestal sinus lift techniques: osteotome versus osseodensification. a systematic review and meta‐analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cobo Vázquez, Carlos
García-Rodríguez, Sonia
Colmenares-Otero, María Eugenia
Sáez-Alcaide, Luis Miguel
Cortés Bretón Brinkmann, Jorge
Madrigal Martínez-Pereda, Cristina María
Meniz García, Cristina María
author Cobo Vázquez, Carlos
author_facet Cobo Vázquez, Carlos
García-Rodríguez, Sonia
Colmenares-Otero, María Eugenia
Sáez-Alcaide, Luis Miguel
Cortés Bretón Brinkmann, Jorge
Madrigal Martínez-Pereda, Cristina María
Meniz García, Cristina María
author_role author
author2 García-Rodríguez, Sonia
Colmenares-Otero, María Eugenia
Sáez-Alcaide, Luis Miguel
Cortés Bretón Brinkmann, Jorge
Madrigal Martínez-Pereda, Cristina María
Meniz García, Cristina María
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv 616.314-089.843:612.753
Crestal sinus lift
Maxillary sinus lift
Osseodensification
Osteotome
Odontología (Odontología)
Cirugía bucofacial
Implantes dentales
Sistema musculoesquelético
Diagnóstico por imagen y medicina nuclear
3299 Otras Especialidades Médicas
3213.04 Cirugía de Huesos
2209.90 Tratamiento Digital. Imágenes
topic 616.314-089.843:612.753
Crestal sinus lift
Maxillary sinus lift
Osseodensification
Osteotome
Odontología (Odontología)
Cirugía bucofacial
Implantes dentales
Sistema musculoesquelético
Diagnóstico por imagen y medicina nuclear
3299 Otras Especialidades Médicas
3213.04 Cirugía de Huesos
2209.90 Tratamiento Digital. Imágenes
description Purpose: Maxillary sinus floor elevation is a safe and effective surgical technique for achieving vertical bone height, performed through either a lateral or crestal approach. The latter includes both the osteotome technique and osseodensification. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the outcomes of the classic crestal sinus lift technique and the osseodensification sinus lift approach in terms of the bone gain, marginal bone loss, survival rate, follow-up time and complications. Methods: This review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was conducted across three databases: (1) The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed); (2) SCOPUS; and (3) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and the Cochrane Collaboration tool for evaluating risk of bias. A meta-analysis for random effects was carried out for implant survival, residual bone height and bone gain. Results: Thirteen studies were included, ten studies performed the osteotome (OST) approach and three performed the osseodensification (OD) approach, with a total of 519 sites treated. The residual bone height was 5.94 and 5.00 mm for OD and OST, respectively. For bone gain, similar results were found for both groups, being 3.37 mm for OD and 3.18 mm for OST. For both groups, the most used diameter and length of the implant was 4 and 10 mm, respectively, and the implant survival rates ranged from 94.1% to 100%. OST technique reflected a complication rate of 14.32%, compared to the OD technique, which showed a complication rate of 2.78%. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the maxillary sinus lift by osseodesinfication approach is a safe, predictable and successful technique compared to the osteotome approach, with similar outcomes regarding bone gain which is an important parameter for implant placement.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025
2025-01-01
2025
2025-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/120538
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/120538
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Docta Complutense
instname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
instname_str Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
reponame_str Docta Complutense
collection Docta Complutense
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869424559191490560
score 15.198674

Similares en LA Referencia