Are bottled mineral waters and groundwater for human supply different?
[EN] Increasingly, bottled natural mineral water (NMW) is proposed as a healthy and safe alternative to supply water. However, tap supply water often comes from aquifers (TGW), even from the same aquifers as NMW, sharing the exact formation mechanisms and mineralization processes. Therefore, it is h...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/377175 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/377175 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85129243393 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Machine learning Bottled mineral water Explainable AI Groundwater Hydrochemistry http://metadata.un.org/sdg/6 Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all |
| id |
ES_f40fca339c727a11ba330e99df2be5dc |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/377175 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Are bottled mineral waters and groundwater for human supply different?Moreno Merino, LuisAguilera Alonso, HéctorLosa Román, Almudena de laMachine learningBottled mineral waterExplainable AIGroundwaterHydrochemistryhttp://metadata.un.org/sdg/6Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all[EN] Increasingly, bottled natural mineral water (NMW) is proposed as a healthy and safe alternative to supply water. However, tap supply water often comes from aquifers (TGW), even from the same aquifers as NMW, sharing the exact formation mechanisms and mineralization processes. Therefore, it is hypothesized that NMW and TGW cannot be distinguished. The chemical composition of TGW and NMW samples in Spain has been compared using five criteria: expert judgment, hydrochemistry, legal regulations, statistical analysis, and machine learning (ML). Hydrochemical criteria included all the NMW samples in the TGW group, as did the legal criterion, whereas classical statistical analysis could not find significant differences between the two groups. Although experts could correctly differentiate a small subsample of both types of water with an accuracy of 0.67, ML-based classification with Extreme Gradient Boosting yielded a balanced accuracy of 0.92 on an extremely imbalanced data set. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis identified pH, SiO2, E, K+, Ca2+, K+/Na+ and NO3- as the most relevant variables for water type discrimination. The overall consistency and generalization ability of the ML classifier has been proven by the spatial distribution of hits and misses, where the few cases of indistinguishable waters seem to be related to proximity to nature reserves (i.e., land use) more than to geological characteristics. Therefore, it can be concluded that NMW and TGW are indeed different and that only ML could find the hidden structure in the chemical data that determines the differences. This structure originates in how the market and consumers decide which water is ultimately bottled. The results can help on future choices of TGW and NMW in a context of water scarcity.This work is part of the activities of the IGME-2896 project funded by the YEI (Youth Employment Initiative) and the European Social Fund (ESF) through the National System of Youth Guarantee (PEJ2018-002477) supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.Peer reviewedElsevierEuropean CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)Moreno Merino, Luis [0000-0002-9984-6035]Aguilera Alonso, Héctor [0000-0001-9046-5837]Losa Román, Almudena de la [0000-0002-2493-7098]Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]202520252022info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/377175https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85129243393reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Inglés#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC//PEJ2018-002477https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155554Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/3771752026-05-22T06:33:51Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Are bottled mineral waters and groundwater for human supply different? |
| title |
Are bottled mineral waters and groundwater for human supply different? |
| spellingShingle |
Are bottled mineral waters and groundwater for human supply different? Moreno Merino, Luis Machine learning Bottled mineral water Explainable AI Groundwater Hydrochemistry http://metadata.un.org/sdg/6 Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all |
| title_short |
Are bottled mineral waters and groundwater for human supply different? |
| title_full |
Are bottled mineral waters and groundwater for human supply different? |
| title_fullStr |
Are bottled mineral waters and groundwater for human supply different? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Are bottled mineral waters and groundwater for human supply different? |
| title_sort |
Are bottled mineral waters and groundwater for human supply different? |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Moreno Merino, Luis Aguilera Alonso, Héctor Losa Román, Almudena de la |
| author |
Moreno Merino, Luis |
| author_facet |
Moreno Merino, Luis Aguilera Alonso, Héctor Losa Román, Almudena de la |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Aguilera Alonso, Héctor Losa Román, Almudena de la |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
European Commission Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España) Moreno Merino, Luis [0000-0002-9984-6035] Aguilera Alonso, Héctor [0000-0001-9046-5837] Losa Román, Almudena de la [0000-0002-2493-7098] Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72] |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Machine learning Bottled mineral water Explainable AI Groundwater Hydrochemistry http://metadata.un.org/sdg/6 Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all |
| topic |
Machine learning Bottled mineral water Explainable AI Groundwater Hydrochemistry http://metadata.un.org/sdg/6 Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all |
| description |
[EN] Increasingly, bottled natural mineral water (NMW) is proposed as a healthy and safe alternative to supply water. However, tap supply water often comes from aquifers (TGW), even from the same aquifers as NMW, sharing the exact formation mechanisms and mineralization processes. Therefore, it is hypothesized that NMW and TGW cannot be distinguished. The chemical composition of TGW and NMW samples in Spain has been compared using five criteria: expert judgment, hydrochemistry, legal regulations, statistical analysis, and machine learning (ML). Hydrochemical criteria included all the NMW samples in the TGW group, as did the legal criterion, whereas classical statistical analysis could not find significant differences between the two groups. Although experts could correctly differentiate a small subsample of both types of water with an accuracy of 0.67, ML-based classification with Extreme Gradient Boosting yielded a balanced accuracy of 0.92 on an extremely imbalanced data set. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis identified pH, SiO2, E, K+, Ca2+, K+/Na+ and NO3- as the most relevant variables for water type discrimination. The overall consistency and generalization ability of the ML classifier has been proven by the spatial distribution of hits and misses, where the few cases of indistinguishable waters seem to be related to proximity to nature reserves (i.e., land use) more than to geological characteristics. Therefore, it can be concluded that NMW and TGW are indeed different and that only ML could find the hidden structure in the chemical data that determines the differences. This structure originates in how the market and consumers decide which water is ultimately bottled. The results can help on future choices of TGW and NMW in a context of water scarcity. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022 2025 2025 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Publisher's version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/377175 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85129243393 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/377175 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85129243393 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC//PEJ2018-002477 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155554 Sí |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| reponame_str |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| collection |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869424436460912640 |
| score |
15,811543 |