Nota crítica a dos comentarios carolingios al Arte mayor de Donato. Una posible ocurrencia de scalenos
The paper tries to shed light into a passage present in two edited Carolingian commentaries on Donatus’ Ars Maior. The text of the manuscripts and editions offers the dark word scalineon, which is neither quoted in ThLL nor included in Latin and Greek reference dictionaries1. In our opinion, it shou...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Huelva (UHU) |
| Repositorio: | Arias Montano. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ariasmontano.uhu.es:10272/11581 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10272/11581 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Textual criticism Commentaries on Donatus’ grammar Scalenus Crítica textual Comentarios a Donato Escaleno |
| Sumario: | The paper tries to shed light into a passage present in two edited Carolingian commentaries on Donatus’ Ars Maior. The text of the manuscripts and editions offers the dark word scalineon, which is neither quoted in ThLL nor included in Latin and Greek reference dictionaries1. In our opinion, it should be read as scalenon, the geometrical figure with different angles and sides. We also propose other minor emendations linked to this one |
|---|