Clinical and radiographic performance of two distinct sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial

Aim: To compare the clinical performance of two sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces regarding changes inradiographic marginal bone level (MBL) 12 months after loading.Materials and Methods: In this randomized, split-mouth, dual-center clinical trial, each patient received one test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Vílchez, Blanca, Caneiro, Leticia, Lima, Cristina, Sanz Sánchez, Ignacio, Montero, Eduardo, Figuero, Elena, Blanco Carrión, Juan, Sanz, Mariano
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2026
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
Repositorio:Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:minerva_____::4743bd857633e224042099df8843f8c8
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10347/47481
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Dental implant
Implant surface
Marginal bone level
Osseointegration
Randomized clinical trial
321313 Ortodoncia-estomatología
id ES_f39851ffe7dbc5f324651cdda05ab6b0
oai_identifier_str oai:dnet:minerva_____::4743bd857633e224042099df8843f8c8
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical and radiographic performance of two distinct sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces: A split-mouth randomized clinical trialVílchez, BlancaCaneiro, LeticiaLima, CristinaSanz Sánchez, IgnacioMontero, EduardoFiguero, ElenaBlanco Carrión, JuanSanz, MarianoDental implantImplant surfaceMarginal bone levelOsseointegrationRandomized clinical trial321313 Ortodoncia-estomatologíaAim: To compare the clinical performance of two sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces regarding changes inradiographic marginal bone level (MBL) 12 months after loading.Materials and Methods: In this randomized, split-mouth, dual-center clinical trial, each patient received one test (modifiedhydrophilic surface) implant and one control (conventional surface) implant. The primary endpoint was the change in MBLmeasured 12 months after loading. Secondary outcomes included the assessment of soft tissue wound healing index (WHI),adverse events, implant stability quotient (ISQ), peri-implant soft tissue parameters (probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing,keratinized mucosa width), and oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) measured with the Oral Health Impact Profile-14(OHIP-14). Generalized linear models, paired Student's t-tests, and Wilcoxon tests were employed for data analysis.Results: The study included 68 subjects (136 implants). No statistically significant differences were found between groups forany of the clinical outcomes measured. The mean change in MBL from loading to 12 months was 0.04 mm (SD = 0.39) for themodified hydrophilic implants and 0.07 mm (SD = 0.22) for the conventional implants (p = 0.658), with no significant differencesbetween the groups.Conclusions: Over a 12-month period of functional loading, both implant surfaces demonstrated comparable performance re-garding peri-implant bone stability, safety, and clinical outcomes. Although a small but statistically significant difference be-tween groups was observed in MBL changes from baseline to 12 months (MD = 0.15 mm), no significant differences were foundin MBL changes from loading to 12 months (primary outcome), ISQ, soft tissue healing, or peri-implant health.WileyUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Cirurxía e Especialidades Médico-Cirúrxicas20262026-01-0120262026-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10347/47481reponame:Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostelainstname:Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2© 2025 The Author(s). Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:dnet:minerva_____::4743bd857633e224042099df8843f8c82026-06-15T12:47:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical and radiographic performance of two distinct sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial
title Clinical and radiographic performance of two distinct sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Clinical and radiographic performance of two distinct sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial
Vílchez, Blanca
Dental implant
Implant surface
Marginal bone level
Osseointegration
Randomized clinical trial
321313 Ortodoncia-estomatología
title_short Clinical and radiographic performance of two distinct sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial
title_full Clinical and radiographic performance of two distinct sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Clinical and radiographic performance of two distinct sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and radiographic performance of two distinct sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial
title_sort Clinical and radiographic performance of two distinct sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vílchez, Blanca
Caneiro, Leticia
Lima, Cristina
Sanz Sánchez, Ignacio
Montero, Eduardo
Figuero, Elena
Blanco Carrión, Juan
Sanz, Mariano
author Vílchez, Blanca
author_facet Vílchez, Blanca
Caneiro, Leticia
Lima, Cristina
Sanz Sánchez, Ignacio
Montero, Eduardo
Figuero, Elena
Blanco Carrión, Juan
Sanz, Mariano
author_role author
author2 Caneiro, Leticia
Lima, Cristina
Sanz Sánchez, Ignacio
Montero, Eduardo
Figuero, Elena
Blanco Carrión, Juan
Sanz, Mariano
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Cirurxía e Especialidades Médico-Cirúrxicas
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Dental implant
Implant surface
Marginal bone level
Osseointegration
Randomized clinical trial
321313 Ortodoncia-estomatología
topic Dental implant
Implant surface
Marginal bone level
Osseointegration
Randomized clinical trial
321313 Ortodoncia-estomatología
description Aim: To compare the clinical performance of two sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implant surfaces regarding changes inradiographic marginal bone level (MBL) 12 months after loading.Materials and Methods: In this randomized, split-mouth, dual-center clinical trial, each patient received one test (modifiedhydrophilic surface) implant and one control (conventional surface) implant. The primary endpoint was the change in MBLmeasured 12 months after loading. Secondary outcomes included the assessment of soft tissue wound healing index (WHI),adverse events, implant stability quotient (ISQ), peri-implant soft tissue parameters (probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing,keratinized mucosa width), and oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) measured with the Oral Health Impact Profile-14(OHIP-14). Generalized linear models, paired Student's t-tests, and Wilcoxon tests were employed for data analysis.Results: The study included 68 subjects (136 implants). No statistically significant differences were found between groups forany of the clinical outcomes measured. The mean change in MBL from loading to 12 months was 0.04 mm (SD = 0.39) for themodified hydrophilic implants and 0.07 mm (SD = 0.22) for the conventional implants (p = 0.658), with no significant differencesbetween the groups.Conclusions: Over a 12-month period of functional loading, both implant surfaces demonstrated comparable performance re-garding peri-implant bone stability, safety, and clinical outcomes. Although a small but statistically significant difference be-tween groups was observed in MBL changes from baseline to 12 months (MD = 0.15 mm), no significant differences were foundin MBL changes from loading to 12 months (primary outcome), ISQ, soft tissue healing, or peri-implant health.
publishDate 2026
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2026
2026-01-01
2026
2026-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10347/47481
url https://hdl.handle.net/10347/47481
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
instname:Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
instname_str Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
reponame_str Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
collection Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869424392280211456
score 15,812429

Similares en LA Referencia