Influence of carbon electrode material on energy recovery from winery wastewater using a dual chamber microbial fuel cell

The aim of this work was to evaluate three carbon materials as anodes in microbial fuel cells (MFCs), clarifying their influence on the generation of electricity and on the treatability of winery wastewater, a highly organic-loaded waste. The electrode materials tested were carbon felt, carbon cloth...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Dellosso Penteado, Eduardo, Fernández Marchante, Carmen María, Rodrigo Rodrigo, Manuel Andrés, Zaiat, Marcelo, González, Ernesto Rafael
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2016
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Repositório:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
OAI Identifier:oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/17734
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10578/17734
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Wastewater treatment
Energy recovery
Winery wastewater
Microbial fuel cell
Electrode material
Descrição
Resumo:The aim of this work was to evaluate three carbon materials as anodes in microbial fuel cells (MFCs), clarifying their influence on the generation of electricity and on the treatability of winery wastewater, a highly organic-loaded waste. The electrode materials tested were carbon felt, carbon cloth and carbon paper and they were used at the same time as anode and cathode in the tests. The MFC equipped with carbon felt reached the highest voltage and power (72 mV and 420 mW m−2, respectively), while the lowest values were observed when carbon paper was used as electrode (0.2 mV and 8.37·10−6 mW m−2, respectively). Chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal from the wastewater was observed to depend on the electrode material, as well. When carbon felt was used, the MFC showed the highest average organic matter consumption rate (650 mg COD L−1 d−1), whereas by using carbon paper the rate decreased to 270 mg COD L−1 d−1. Therefore, both electricity generation and organic matter removal are strongly related not to the chemical composition of the electrode (which was graphite carbon in the three electrodes), but to its surface features and, consequently, to the amount of biomass adhered to the electrode surface.