Bull semen obtained on beef farms by electroejaculation: sperm quality in the first two hours of storing with different extenders and holding temperatures

Sperm quality decreases over time, so bull semen may need to be preserved after field collection. However, the effect of handling such semen samples from commercial farms and placing them in very short–term storage has not been elucidated. Therefore, ejaculate from 25 bulls from 1 dairy and 14 beef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pernas, Santiago, Fernández-Novo, Aitor, Barrajon-Masa, Clara, Mozas, Patricia, Pérez-Villalobos, Natividad, Martín-Maldonado, Bárbara, Oliet, Agustín, Astiz, Susana, Pérez Garnelo, Sonia Salome
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositorio:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/310507
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/310507
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:BBSE
Short–term storage
Seminal parameters
CASA parameters
Semen extenders
Descripción
Sumario:Sperm quality decreases over time, so bull semen may need to be preserved after field collection. However, the effect of handling such semen samples from commercial farms and placing them in very short–term storage has not been elucidated. Therefore, ejaculate from 25 bulls from 1 dairy and 14 beef cattle farms were collected under farm conditions and evaluated for semen quality during the first two hours after collection. Two commercial extenders (AndroMed<sup>®</sup> and BIOXcell<sup>®</sup>) and two different storage temperatures (5 °C and room temperature) were used to evaluate the influence on semen quality and sperm kinetics in ejaculates grouped into three evaluation times, based on time since collection (Time 1: <75 min, <i>n</i> = 7; Time 2: 75–105 min, <i>n</i> = 11; and Time 3: 105–120 min, <i>n</i> = 7). Classical semen parameters, sperm motion kinetics by CASA and colony-forming units were assessed. The differences between both extenders in curvilinear and straight–line velocities (VCL and VSL) for the different time groups (Time 2 and Time 3) were statistically significant for <i>p</i> < 0.05. AndroMed<sup>®</sup> showed lower VSL, straightness and linearity in sperm compared to BIOXcell<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In conclusion, AndroMed<sup>®</sup> induced more curvilinear movement, while BIOXcell<sup>®</sup> stimulated straighter motility.