Harmless discrimination

In Born Free and Equal: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature of Discrimination, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen defends the harm-based account of the wrongness of discrimination, which explains the wrongness of discrimination with reference to the harmfulness of discriminatory acts. Against this view, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Slavny, Adam, Parr, Tom
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2015
País:España
Institución:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Repositorio:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/49034
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/49034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352325215000130
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Discriminació
Discriminació -- Aspectes legals
Discriminació -- Aspectes polítics
id ES_efbf8a58245c951a42e6ef62bbfd7326
oai_identifier_str oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/49034
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Harmless discriminationSlavny, AdamParr, TomDiscriminacióDiscriminació -- Aspectes legalsDiscriminació -- Aspectes políticsIn Born Free and Equal: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature of Discrimination, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen defends the harm-based account of the wrongness of discrimination, which explains the wrongness of discrimination with reference to the harmfulness of discriminatory acts. Against this view, we offer two objections. The conditions objection states that the harm-based account implausibly fails to recognize that harmless discrimination can be wrong. The explanation objection states that the harm-based account fails adequately to identify all of the wrong-making properties of discriminatory acts. We argue that the structure of a satisfactory view cannot be outcome-focused. A more promising family of views focuses on the deliberation of the discriminator and in particular on the reasons that motivate or fail to motivate her action.Cambridge University Press202120212015info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/49034http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352325215000130reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPFinstname:Universitat Pompeu FabraInglésLegal Theory. 2015 Jun;21(2):100-14© Cambridge University Press. The published version of the article: Slavny A, Parr T. Harmless discrimination. Legal Theory. 2015 Jun;21(2):100-14. DOI: 10.1017/S1352325215000130 is available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/legal-theory.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/490342026-06-12T07:21:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Harmless discrimination
title Harmless discrimination
spellingShingle Harmless discrimination
Slavny, Adam
Discriminació
Discriminació -- Aspectes legals
Discriminació -- Aspectes polítics
title_short Harmless discrimination
title_full Harmless discrimination
title_fullStr Harmless discrimination
title_full_unstemmed Harmless discrimination
title_sort Harmless discrimination
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Slavny, Adam
Parr, Tom
author Slavny, Adam
author_facet Slavny, Adam
Parr, Tom
author_role author
author2 Parr, Tom
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Discriminació
Discriminació -- Aspectes legals
Discriminació -- Aspectes polítics
topic Discriminació
Discriminació -- Aspectes legals
Discriminació -- Aspectes polítics
description In Born Free and Equal: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature of Discrimination, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen defends the harm-based account of the wrongness of discrimination, which explains the wrongness of discrimination with reference to the harmfulness of discriminatory acts. Against this view, we offer two objections. The conditions objection states that the harm-based account implausibly fails to recognize that harmless discrimination can be wrong. The explanation objection states that the harm-based account fails adequately to identify all of the wrong-making properties of discriminatory acts. We argue that the structure of a satisfactory view cannot be outcome-focused. A more promising family of views focuses on the deliberation of the discriminator and in particular on the reasons that motivate or fail to motivate her action.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2021
2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/49034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352325215000130
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/49034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352325215000130
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Legal Theory. 2015 Jun;21(2):100-14
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
instname:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
instname_str Universitat Pompeu Fabra
reponame_str Repositorio Digital de la UPF
collection Repositorio Digital de la UPF
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869423892821442560
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia