Assessment for learning: science teachers’ ideas on assessment of core competences in science understanding
This study has two objectives: to describe the nature of the main competencies to acquire in the context of experimental sciences and its implications for assessment, and to analyse the kinds of task preferred by teachers for their assessment. Four basic competencies, whose importance is specially u...
| Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Publication Date: | 2012 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Universidad Autónoma de Madrid |
| Repository: | Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM |
| Language: | English |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/666657 |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10486/666657 https://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021037012800218023 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Assessment Competencies Text comprehension Understanding of tables Understanding of graphs Scientific thinking Evaluación Competencias Comprensión de textos Comprensión de tablas Comprensión de gráficos Pensamiento científico Psicología |
| Summary: | This study has two objectives: to describe the nature of the main competencies to acquire in the context of experimental sciences and its implications for assessment, and to analyse the kinds of task preferred by teachers for their assessment. Four basic competencies, whose importance is specially underlined in the Spanish curriculum, have been considered: Conceptual understanding, Scientific text comprehension, Tables and graphs understanding, and Use of scientific thinking. Five different complexity levels for assessing the degree of each competence acquisition have been established. Our data, obtained from a sample of 30 Spanish Secondary School teachers, show that teachers tend to assess mainly Conceptual understanding no matter the level of difficulty, secondly, Use of scientific thinking conceived as solving standard problems, and finally, assessment of Text, Table and Graph understanding presents a great scattering, depending on the level of task difficulty. ANOVA results show that, in general, tasks implying lower levels of cognitive demand are used more often than most difficult tasks. Finally, to identify teachers’ profiles in relation to the kinds of task they use, a correlation analysis has been done. |
|---|