Ganimedes en el diván: etiología de la homosexualidad masculina desde el psicoanálisis

The relationship between psychoanalysis and homosexuality has been troublesome and ambiguous. Psychoanalytic thinking about male homosexuality was probably more culturally biased and in uenced by the personal inclinations of analytical authors than other subjects. This thesis rstly aims to be a hist...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Magistrali, Danilo
Formato: tesis doctoral
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Recursos:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/22698
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/22698
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:613.885(043.2)
Homosexualidad
Homosexuality
Medicina
32 Ciencias Médicas
id ES_ef0cc2c2857d3f7aafe1eb96d7a074b0
oai_identifier_str oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/22698
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Ganimedes en el diván: etiología de la homosexualidad masculina desde el psicoanálisisMagistrali, Danilo613.885(043.2)HomosexualidadHomosexualityMedicina32 Ciencias MédicasThe relationship between psychoanalysis and homosexuality has been troublesome and ambiguous. Psychoanalytic thinking about male homosexuality was probably more culturally biased and in uenced by the personal inclinations of analytical authors than other subjects. This thesis rstly aims to be a history of this con ict and secondly to clarify the reasons of this ambiguity. Freud was ambiguous when, on the one hand, he declared that homosexuals were not sick and even defended their right to become psychoanalysts and, on the other hand, developed the conceptual basis of an etiopathological theory that considered homosexuality a block in the psychosexual development of an individual. A preliminary and fundamental question in writing a history of psychoanalytic theories of homosexuality is the following one: what is the meaning of the word homosexuality in psychoanalysis? Or rather, what are the characteristics of the anthropological type that psychoanalysis calls homosexual? Since the publication of the History of Sexuality by Michel Foucault, there have been numerous studies that help to answer this question. For Freud, the homosexual is the anthropological type described by the medical science in the late nineteenth century. He is the homosexual described by Kra t-Ebing, Schrenck-Notzing and Binet. Foucault explained how the medical imperialism of the late nineteenth century shaped the conception of sexuality and created new anthropological types, including the homosexual. The homosexual is now a species. Studies on the relationships between homosexuality and psychoanalysis are not numerous. Furthermore, very important authors such as Bion, Winnicott and Lacan have touched only tangentially the issue of homosexuality. Even fewer are the critical studies about the history of the psychoanalytic theories of homosexuality. The rst systematic study of the relationship between psychoanalysis and homosexuality is the book written by Kenneth Lewes The Psychoanalytic Theory of Male Homosexuality published in 1988. It may be the best book written on this theme. The author chooses not to analyze the positions of Jung, Fromm, Stekel and generally favors American authors. He does not include, in his discussion, the criticisms that Foucault addressed to the medical psychiatric discourse right in those years, so Lewes does not re ect on the meaning of homosexual as a clinical subject in psychoanalytic thought. Moreover, the history he presents ends with the beginning of what we have called the third phase of the psychoanalytic approach to homosexuality...Universidad Complutense de MadridMontiel Llorente, LuisUniversidad Complutense de Madrid20172017-10-0220172017-10-02doctoral thesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/22698reponame:Docta Complutenseinstname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)Españolspaopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/226982026-06-02T12:44:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ganimedes en el diván: etiología de la homosexualidad masculina desde el psicoanálisis
title Ganimedes en el diván: etiología de la homosexualidad masculina desde el psicoanálisis
spellingShingle Ganimedes en el diván: etiología de la homosexualidad masculina desde el psicoanálisis
Magistrali, Danilo
613.885(043.2)
Homosexualidad
Homosexuality
Medicina
32 Ciencias Médicas
title_short Ganimedes en el diván: etiología de la homosexualidad masculina desde el psicoanálisis
title_full Ganimedes en el diván: etiología de la homosexualidad masculina desde el psicoanálisis
title_fullStr Ganimedes en el diván: etiología de la homosexualidad masculina desde el psicoanálisis
title_full_unstemmed Ganimedes en el diván: etiología de la homosexualidad masculina desde el psicoanálisis
title_sort Ganimedes en el diván: etiología de la homosexualidad masculina desde el psicoanálisis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Magistrali, Danilo
author Magistrali, Danilo
author_facet Magistrali, Danilo
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Montiel Llorente, Luis
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv 613.885(043.2)
Homosexualidad
Homosexuality
Medicina
32 Ciencias Médicas
topic 613.885(043.2)
Homosexualidad
Homosexuality
Medicina
32 Ciencias Médicas
description The relationship between psychoanalysis and homosexuality has been troublesome and ambiguous. Psychoanalytic thinking about male homosexuality was probably more culturally biased and in uenced by the personal inclinations of analytical authors than other subjects. This thesis rstly aims to be a history of this con ict and secondly to clarify the reasons of this ambiguity. Freud was ambiguous when, on the one hand, he declared that homosexuals were not sick and even defended their right to become psychoanalysts and, on the other hand, developed the conceptual basis of an etiopathological theory that considered homosexuality a block in the psychosexual development of an individual. A preliminary and fundamental question in writing a history of psychoanalytic theories of homosexuality is the following one: what is the meaning of the word homosexuality in psychoanalysis? Or rather, what are the characteristics of the anthropological type that psychoanalysis calls homosexual? Since the publication of the History of Sexuality by Michel Foucault, there have been numerous studies that help to answer this question. For Freud, the homosexual is the anthropological type described by the medical science in the late nineteenth century. He is the homosexual described by Kra t-Ebing, Schrenck-Notzing and Binet. Foucault explained how the medical imperialism of the late nineteenth century shaped the conception of sexuality and created new anthropological types, including the homosexual. The homosexual is now a species. Studies on the relationships between homosexuality and psychoanalysis are not numerous. Furthermore, very important authors such as Bion, Winnicott and Lacan have touched only tangentially the issue of homosexuality. Even fewer are the critical studies about the history of the psychoanalytic theories of homosexuality. The rst systematic study of the relationship between psychoanalysis and homosexuality is the book written by Kenneth Lewes The Psychoanalytic Theory of Male Homosexuality published in 1988. It may be the best book written on this theme. The author chooses not to analyze the positions of Jung, Fromm, Stekel and generally favors American authors. He does not include, in his discussion, the criticisms that Foucault addressed to the medical psychiatric discourse right in those years, so Lewes does not re ect on the meaning of homosexual as a clinical subject in psychoanalytic thought. Moreover, the history he presents ends with the beginning of what we have called the third phase of the psychoanalytic approach to homosexuality...
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-10-02
2017
2017-10-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv doctoral thesis
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/22698
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/22698
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Español
spa
language_invalid_str_mv Español
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Complutense de Madrid
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Docta Complutense
instname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
instname_str Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
reponame_str Docta Complutense
collection Docta Complutense
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869423827234062337
score 15,301603

Registos relacionados