¿Existe contradicción entre la jurisdicción laboral y la contencioso-administrativa respecto al reconocimiento de quinquenios de docencia y sexenios de investigación del profesorado asociado? A propósito de la sentencia del Tribunal Supremo (Sala de lo contencioso-administrativo) de 20 de mayo de 2024
This study analyses the arguments put forward by the STS (Administrative Litigation Chamber) of 20 May 2024 to deny the right of an associate professor at the University of Granada to access the evaluation procedure for his teaching and research activity, in order to determine whether or not this co...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/469126 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.31009/IUSLabor.2024.i03.05 https://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/469126 http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/469126 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Personal docente e investigador laboral Profesores asociados Quinquenios docentes |
| Sumario: | This study analyses the arguments put forward by the STS (Administrative Litigation Chamber) of 20 May 2024 to deny the right of an associate professor at the University of Granada to access the evaluation procedure for his teaching and research activity, in order to determine whether or not this contradicts the doctrine contained in the judgments of the Social Chamber of the Supreme Court of 10 December 2020 and 25 January 2023 which, in relation to temporary teaching and research staff, including associate professors, at public universities in Madrid, had concluded that he did have the right to subject his teaching and research activity to evaluation. |
|---|