A comparative study of machine learning, deep neural networks and random utility maximization models for travel mode choice modelling
Traditionally, Random Utility Maximization (RUM) models have been widely applied to travel mode choice modelling. Currently, Machine Learning (ML) models are being applied as an alternative to RUM models, since they provide better results in terms of prediction capability and they can manage large v...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| Repositorio: | RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/32968 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352146522001740 https://hdl.handle.net/10578/32968 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Random Utility Maximization models Deep Neural Networks Machine Learning models Travel behaviour |
| id |
ES_eebbddba6715ddefebf70d599e494d85 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/32968 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
A comparative study of machine learning, deep neural networks and random utility maximization models for travel mode choice modellingGarcía García, José CarlosGarcía Ródenas, RicardoLópez Gómez, Julio AlbertoMartín Baos, José ÁngelRandom Utility Maximization modelsDeep Neural NetworksMachine Learning modelsTravel behaviourTraditionally, Random Utility Maximization (RUM) models have been widely applied to travel mode choice modelling. Currently, Machine Learning (ML) models are being applied as an alternative to RUM models, since they provide better results in terms of prediction capability and they can manage large volumes of data. In this paper, a comprehensive comparison between classic RUM models and ML models, including single and ensemble classifiers as well as Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), is provided in order to assess systematically the performance of different models over two different datasets which have different sizes and nature of data. Numerical experiments show Random Forest (RF) is the best classifier in terms of accuracy index and the computational cost to train the model.Elsevier202420242022info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352146522001740https://hdl.handle.net/10578/32968reponame:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLMinstname:Universidad de Castilla-La ManchaInglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/329682026-05-27T07:36:41Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparative study of machine learning, deep neural networks and random utility maximization models for travel mode choice modelling |
| title |
A comparative study of machine learning, deep neural networks and random utility maximization models for travel mode choice modelling |
| spellingShingle |
A comparative study of machine learning, deep neural networks and random utility maximization models for travel mode choice modelling García García, José Carlos Random Utility Maximization models Deep Neural Networks Machine Learning models Travel behaviour |
| title_short |
A comparative study of machine learning, deep neural networks and random utility maximization models for travel mode choice modelling |
| title_full |
A comparative study of machine learning, deep neural networks and random utility maximization models for travel mode choice modelling |
| title_fullStr |
A comparative study of machine learning, deep neural networks and random utility maximization models for travel mode choice modelling |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative study of machine learning, deep neural networks and random utility maximization models for travel mode choice modelling |
| title_sort |
A comparative study of machine learning, deep neural networks and random utility maximization models for travel mode choice modelling |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
García García, José Carlos García Ródenas, Ricardo López Gómez, Julio Alberto Martín Baos, José Ángel |
| author |
García García, José Carlos |
| author_facet |
García García, José Carlos García Ródenas, Ricardo López Gómez, Julio Alberto Martín Baos, José Ángel |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
García Ródenas, Ricardo López Gómez, Julio Alberto Martín Baos, José Ángel |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Random Utility Maximization models Deep Neural Networks Machine Learning models Travel behaviour |
| topic |
Random Utility Maximization models Deep Neural Networks Machine Learning models Travel behaviour |
| description |
Traditionally, Random Utility Maximization (RUM) models have been widely applied to travel mode choice modelling. Currently, Machine Learning (ML) models are being applied as an alternative to RUM models, since they provide better results in terms of prediction capability and they can manage large volumes of data. In this paper, a comprehensive comparison between classic RUM models and ML models, including single and ensemble classifiers as well as Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), is provided in order to assess systematically the performance of different models over two different datasets which have different sizes and nature of data. Numerical experiments show Random Forest (RF) is the best classifier in terms of accuracy index and the computational cost to train the model. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022 2024 2024 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352146522001740 https://hdl.handle.net/10578/32968 |
| url |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352146522001740 https://hdl.handle.net/10578/32968 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM instname:Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| reponame_str |
RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| collection |
RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869423773341450240 |
| score |
15,300719 |