A comparison of different approaches for the analysis of $^{36}Cl$ in graphite samples
This study compares different approaches for the quantification of the massic activity of $^{36}Cl$ in graphite samples. All approaches consisted of a combustion step in combination with a trapping solution to collect the volatile elements. Two different resins were used to separate $^{36}Cl$ from t...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:recercat____::d1d64454df38bef0ab31c4905cf2b538 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/229232 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Piròlisi Grafit Química mineralògica Pyrolysis Graphite Mineralogical chemistry |
| Sumario: | This study compares different approaches for the quantification of the massic activity of $^{36}Cl$ in graphite samples. All approaches consisted of a combustion step in combination with a trapping solution to collect the volatile elements. Two different resins were used to separate $^{36}Cl$ from the matrix (CL resin and PS resin). Liquid scintillation counting (LSC), scintillation counting (SC) and tandem inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS/MS) were used to quantify $^{36}Cl$ activity. The chemical yield in all approaches was determined by means of ion chromatography (IC). In addition, the methods were applied to a real activated graphite sample. |
|---|