Principles and attributes of evidence-based co-creation: From naïve praxis toward a trustworthy methodology - A Health CASCADE study
Objectives Co-creation is recognised as a promising methodology for addressing complex public health issues by leveraging the collective intelligence of multiple stakeholders to develop tailored solutions. However, there is a lack of clarity and significant fragmentation in the concept. This study a...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Ramon Llull (URL) |
| Repositorio: | DAU Arxiu Digital de la Universitat Ramon Llull |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dau.url.edu:20.500.14342/5533 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5533 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105922 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Cocreació Codisseny Coproducció Participació ciutadana Ciència ciutadana Compromís Disseny |
| id |
ES_ebf54dd87d625a95fc5ad5a89330c0cf |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:dau.url.edu:20.500.14342/5533 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Principles and attributes of evidence-based co-creation: From naïve praxis toward a trustworthy methodology - A Health CASCADE studyChastin, Sebastien F. M.Smith, NiamhAgnello, Danielle MarieAn, QingfanAltenburg, TeatskeBalaskas, Georgede Boer, JannekeCardon, GreetChin A Paw, MaiChrifou, RababDall, PhilippaDavis, AaronDeforche, B.Delfmann, Lea RahelGiné-Garriga, MariaGoh, KunshanHunter, Simon C.Leask, C. F.Lippke, SoniaLoisel, Quentin Emile ArmandLongworth, Giuliana R.McCaffrey, LaurenMessiha, KatrinaMorejon, SacraPappa, DimitraPapadopoulos, H.Ryde, G. C.Sandlund, MarleneSchreier, MargritSteiner, ArturVerloigne, MaïtéVogelsang, MiraWadell, KarinCocreacióCodissenyCoproduccióParticipació ciutadanaCiència ciutadanaCompromísDissenyObjectives Co-creation is recognised as a promising methodology for addressing complex public health issues by leveraging the collective intelligence of multiple stakeholders to develop tailored solutions. However, there is a lack of clarity and significant fragmentation in the concept. This study aims to define the fundamental attributes and guiding principles of co-creation to establish it as a rigorous, evidence-based, and trustworthy methodology. Study design A participatory concept mapping process based on the Differentiae Principle was employed. Methods The study consisted of four stages: 1) systematic extraction of attributes and their definition from traditional scientific and participatory research methodological literature, 2) screening, 3) semantic analysis and clustering into principles using Natural Language Processing and Large Language Models and 4) selection of a final set of attributes and development of principles. The study involved 50 participants with diverse backgrounds within and outside the Health CASCADE Network over 18 months. Results The study identified 105 candidate attributes. A set of 38 was selected from which 10 key principles were derived (open access, recognised contribution, ethics and legal, transparency, rigorous evaluation, clear problem, plural evidence, critical reflection, diversity, and structured and flexible processes) across three domains: Governance, Scientific and Methodological Rigour, and Collective Intelligence Processes. Conclusions The attributes and guiding principles provide a comprehensive foundations for evidence-based co-creation, enhancing its trustworthiness, transparency, reliability, and impact in public health and other fields. Future research and practice should use these principles and attributes to refine and implement co-creation effectively.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionElsevierUniversitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Ciències de la Salut BlanquernaUniversitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport Blanquerna2025202520252025info:eu-repo/semantics/article7 p.application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5533https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105922reponame:DAU Arxiu Digital de la Universitat Ramon Llullinstname:Universitat Ramon Llull (URL)InglésPublic health, 2025, 248: 105922info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EU/H2020/Grant agreement 956501© L'autor/aAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:dau.url.edu:20.500.14342/55332026-06-21T06:40:37Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Principles and attributes of evidence-based co-creation: From naïve praxis toward a trustworthy methodology - A Health CASCADE study |
| title |
Principles and attributes of evidence-based co-creation: From naïve praxis toward a trustworthy methodology - A Health CASCADE study |
| spellingShingle |
Principles and attributes of evidence-based co-creation: From naïve praxis toward a trustworthy methodology - A Health CASCADE study Chastin, Sebastien F. M. Cocreació Codisseny Coproducció Participació ciutadana Ciència ciutadana Compromís Disseny |
| title_short |
Principles and attributes of evidence-based co-creation: From naïve praxis toward a trustworthy methodology - A Health CASCADE study |
| title_full |
Principles and attributes of evidence-based co-creation: From naïve praxis toward a trustworthy methodology - A Health CASCADE study |
| title_fullStr |
Principles and attributes of evidence-based co-creation: From naïve praxis toward a trustworthy methodology - A Health CASCADE study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Principles and attributes of evidence-based co-creation: From naïve praxis toward a trustworthy methodology - A Health CASCADE study |
| title_sort |
Principles and attributes of evidence-based co-creation: From naïve praxis toward a trustworthy methodology - A Health CASCADE study |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Chastin, Sebastien F. M. Smith, Niamh Agnello, Danielle Marie An, Qingfan Altenburg, Teatske Balaskas, George de Boer, Janneke Cardon, Greet Chin A Paw, Mai Chrifou, Rabab Dall, Philippa Davis, Aaron Deforche, B. Delfmann, Lea Rahel Giné-Garriga, Maria Goh, Kunshan Hunter, Simon C. Leask, C. F. Lippke, Sonia Loisel, Quentin Emile Armand Longworth, Giuliana R. McCaffrey, Lauren Messiha, Katrina Morejon, Sacra Pappa, Dimitra Papadopoulos, H. Ryde, G. C. Sandlund, Marlene Schreier, Margrit Steiner, Artur Verloigne, Maïté Vogelsang, Mira Wadell, Karin |
| author |
Chastin, Sebastien F. M. |
| author_facet |
Chastin, Sebastien F. M. Smith, Niamh Agnello, Danielle Marie An, Qingfan Altenburg, Teatske Balaskas, George de Boer, Janneke Cardon, Greet Chin A Paw, Mai Chrifou, Rabab Dall, Philippa Davis, Aaron Deforche, B. Delfmann, Lea Rahel Giné-Garriga, Maria Goh, Kunshan Hunter, Simon C. Leask, C. F. Lippke, Sonia Loisel, Quentin Emile Armand Longworth, Giuliana R. McCaffrey, Lauren Messiha, Katrina Morejon, Sacra Pappa, Dimitra Papadopoulos, H. Ryde, G. C. Sandlund, Marlene Schreier, Margrit Steiner, Artur Verloigne, Maïté Vogelsang, Mira Wadell, Karin |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Smith, Niamh Agnello, Danielle Marie An, Qingfan Altenburg, Teatske Balaskas, George de Boer, Janneke Cardon, Greet Chin A Paw, Mai Chrifou, Rabab Dall, Philippa Davis, Aaron Deforche, B. Delfmann, Lea Rahel Giné-Garriga, Maria Goh, Kunshan Hunter, Simon C. Leask, C. F. Lippke, Sonia Loisel, Quentin Emile Armand Longworth, Giuliana R. McCaffrey, Lauren Messiha, Katrina Morejon, Sacra Pappa, Dimitra Papadopoulos, H. Ryde, G. C. Sandlund, Marlene Schreier, Margrit Steiner, Artur Verloigne, Maïté Vogelsang, Mira Wadell, Karin |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna Universitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport Blanquerna |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Cocreació Codisseny Coproducció Participació ciutadana Ciència ciutadana Compromís Disseny |
| topic |
Cocreació Codisseny Coproducció Participació ciutadana Ciència ciutadana Compromís Disseny |
| description |
Objectives Co-creation is recognised as a promising methodology for addressing complex public health issues by leveraging the collective intelligence of multiple stakeholders to develop tailored solutions. However, there is a lack of clarity and significant fragmentation in the concept. This study aims to define the fundamental attributes and guiding principles of co-creation to establish it as a rigorous, evidence-based, and trustworthy methodology. Study design A participatory concept mapping process based on the Differentiae Principle was employed. Methods The study consisted of four stages: 1) systematic extraction of attributes and their definition from traditional scientific and participatory research methodological literature, 2) screening, 3) semantic analysis and clustering into principles using Natural Language Processing and Large Language Models and 4) selection of a final set of attributes and development of principles. The study involved 50 participants with diverse backgrounds within and outside the Health CASCADE Network over 18 months. Results The study identified 105 candidate attributes. A set of 38 was selected from which 10 key principles were derived (open access, recognised contribution, ethics and legal, transparency, rigorous evaluation, clear problem, plural evidence, critical reflection, diversity, and structured and flexible processes) across three domains: Governance, Scientific and Methodological Rigour, and Collective Intelligence Processes. Conclusions The attributes and guiding principles provide a comprehensive foundations for evidence-based co-creation, enhancing its trustworthiness, transparency, reliability, and impact in public health and other fields. Future research and practice should use these principles and attributes to refine and implement co-creation effectively. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025 2025 2025 2025 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5533 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105922 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5533 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105922 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Public health, 2025, 248: 105922 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EU/H2020/Grant agreement 956501 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
© L'autor/a Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
© L'autor/a Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
7 p. application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:DAU Arxiu Digital de la Universitat Ramon Llull instname:Universitat Ramon Llull (URL) |
| instname_str |
Universitat Ramon Llull (URL) |
| reponame_str |
DAU Arxiu Digital de la Universitat Ramon Llull |
| collection |
DAU Arxiu Digital de la Universitat Ramon Llull |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869423273450668032 |
| score |
15,81155 |