Long-term comparison shows protected and non-protected forests differ in harvesting, but not in wildfires or drought-driven dieback
[EN] While disturbances are essential for biodiversity, their escalation driven by climate change may threaten forest ecosystems. Contrasting approaches to adapt forests to disturbances—intensifying management versus encouraging natural succession towards more mature ecosystems—have sparked a debate...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2026 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:digitalcsic_::c2c264b669a87060b5ea087ccbb00f08 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/431860 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Climate change European Forest Disturbance Atlas Forest disturbances Habitats directive Natura 2000 |
| Sumario: | [EN] While disturbances are essential for biodiversity, their escalation driven by climate change may threaten forest ecosystems. Contrasting approaches to adapt forests to disturbances—intensifying management versus encouraging natural succession towards more mature ecosystems—have sparked a debate about whether protection influences forests' vulnerability to disturbance. This question, however, has barely been investigated. |
|---|