Phase analysis of near equiatomic bulk FeRh alloys: X-ray versus neutron diffraction and magnetization measurements

The information obtained by X-ray diffraction (XRD) by impinging the X-ray beam onto the flat surface of bulk Fe–Rh alloys is contrasted with that provided by the thermomagnetic analysis curves measured under a magnetic field of 5 mT and 2 T, and the neutron diffraction (ND) patterns. The experiment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Padrón Alemán, K., Arreguín Hernández, M. L., Cuello, G. J., Álvarez Alonso, Pablo|||0000-0002-1996-1616, Sánchez Llamazares, J.L.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Oviedo (UNIOVI)
Repositorio:RUO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:digibuo.uniovi.es:10651/74710
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10651/74710
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.129904
Access Level:acceso embargado
Palabra clave:Iron-rhodium alloys
X-ray and neutron diffraction analyses
First-order magnetoelastic transition
Descripción
Sumario:The information obtained by X-ray diffraction (XRD) by impinging the X-ray beam onto the flat surface of bulk Fe–Rh alloys is contrasted with that provided by the thermomagnetic analysis curves measured under a magnetic field of 5 mT and 2 T, and the neutron diffraction (ND) patterns. The experiments were performed on slices cut from bulk Fe50Rh50 and Fe49Rh51 alloys prepared by induction melting followed by 48 h of thermal annealing at 1273 K. Whereas ND patterns and magnetization curves, directly and indirectly point out that the samples are single-phase with a CsCl-type crystal structure undergoing a magnetoelastic transition that changes the magnetic structure from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic on heating, multiple phases are identified in the XRD patterns, which modify upon polishing or etching the surface with a mixture of hydrochloric (HCl) and nitric acid (HNO3) at a volume ratio of 90:10 from 30 to 210 min. The limitation of XRD for accurately characterizing the phase constitution within the bulk of Fe–Rh alloys is underlined.