Consensus Building With Individual Consistency Control in Group Decision Making

The individual consistency and the consensus degree are two basic measures to conduct group decision making with reciprocal preference relations. The existing frameworks to manage individual consistency and consensus degree have been investigated intensively and follow a common resolution scheme com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Li, CongCong, Rodriguez, Rosa M., Martinez, Luis, Dong, Yucheng, Herrera, Francisco
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2018
Country:España
Institution:Universidad de Jaén
Repository:RUJA. Repositorio Institucional de la Producción Científica de la Universidad de Jaén
OAI Identifier:oai:ruja.ujaen.es:10953/1791
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8410802
https://hdl.handle.net/10953/1791
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Consensus
consistency
group decision making
optimization
preference relations
id ES_e9ba43ce6d4941b2f45c640154ecceeb
oai_identifier_str oai:ruja.ujaen.es:10953/1791
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Consensus Building With Individual Consistency Control in Group Decision MakingLi, CongCongRodriguez, Rosa M.Martinez, LuisDong, YuchengHerrera, FranciscoConsensusconsistencygroup decision makingoptimizationpreference relationsThe individual consistency and the consensus degree are two basic measures to conduct group decision making with reciprocal preference relations. The existing frameworks to manage individual consistency and consensus degree have been investigated intensively and follow a common resolution scheme composed by the two phases: the consistency improving process, and the consensus reaching process. But in these frameworks, the individual consistency will often be destroyed in the consensus reaching process, leading to repeat the consistency improving process, which is time consuming. In order to avoid repeating the consistency improving process, a consensus reaching process with individual consistency control is proposed in this paper. This novel consensus approach is based on the design of an optimization-based consensus rule, which can be used to determine the adjustment range of each preference value guaranteeing the individual consistency across the process. Finally, theoretical and numerical analysis are both used to justify the validity of our proposal.NSF of China under Grant 71571124 and the Sichuan University under Grant sksyl201705 and 2018hhs-58, the Spanish National Research Project TIN2015-66524-P, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Finance Postdoctoral fellow (IJCI-2015-23715), and ERDFIEEE202420242018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8410802https://hdl.handle.net/10953/1791reponame:RUJA. Repositorio Institucional de la Producción Científica de la Universidad de Jaéninstname:Universidad de JaénInglésIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems [2019]; [27]: [319-332]Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Españahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ruja.ujaen.es:10953/17912026-06-24T12:41:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Consensus Building With Individual Consistency Control in Group Decision Making
title Consensus Building With Individual Consistency Control in Group Decision Making
spellingShingle Consensus Building With Individual Consistency Control in Group Decision Making
Li, CongCong
Consensus
consistency
group decision making
optimization
preference relations
title_short Consensus Building With Individual Consistency Control in Group Decision Making
title_full Consensus Building With Individual Consistency Control in Group Decision Making
title_fullStr Consensus Building With Individual Consistency Control in Group Decision Making
title_full_unstemmed Consensus Building With Individual Consistency Control in Group Decision Making
title_sort Consensus Building With Individual Consistency Control in Group Decision Making
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Li, CongCong
Rodriguez, Rosa M.
Martinez, Luis
Dong, Yucheng
Herrera, Francisco
author Li, CongCong
author_facet Li, CongCong
Rodriguez, Rosa M.
Martinez, Luis
Dong, Yucheng
Herrera, Francisco
author_role author
author2 Rodriguez, Rosa M.
Martinez, Luis
Dong, Yucheng
Herrera, Francisco
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Consensus
consistency
group decision making
optimization
preference relations
topic Consensus
consistency
group decision making
optimization
preference relations
description The individual consistency and the consensus degree are two basic measures to conduct group decision making with reciprocal preference relations. The existing frameworks to manage individual consistency and consensus degree have been investigated intensively and follow a common resolution scheme composed by the two phases: the consistency improving process, and the consensus reaching process. But in these frameworks, the individual consistency will often be destroyed in the consensus reaching process, leading to repeat the consistency improving process, which is time consuming. In order to avoid repeating the consistency improving process, a consensus reaching process with individual consistency control is proposed in this paper. This novel consensus approach is based on the design of an optimization-based consensus rule, which can be used to determine the adjustment range of each preference value guaranteeing the individual consistency across the process. Finally, theoretical and numerical analysis are both used to justify the validity of our proposal.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8410802
https://hdl.handle.net/10953/1791
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8410802
https://hdl.handle.net/10953/1791
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems [2019]; [27]: [319-332]
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IEEE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IEEE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RUJA. Repositorio Institucional de la Producción Científica de la Universidad de Jaén
instname:Universidad de Jaén
instname_str Universidad de Jaén
reponame_str RUJA. Repositorio Institucional de la Producción Científica de la Universidad de Jaén
collection RUJA. Repositorio Institucional de la Producción Científica de la Universidad de Jaén
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869423077098520576
score 15.811543

Similar Items