Single-Peakedness in Weighted Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Fuzzy Group

In this paper it is considered a formal approach to the problem of aggregating individual opinions in a fuzzy group, when alternatives can be represented in a real hyper-space and each individual defines his/her fuzzy set of non rejectable alternatives. On one hand, weighted aggregation rule for con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Montero De Juan, Francisco Javier
Tipo de recurso: capítulo de libro
Fecha de publicación:1990
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/60897
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/60897
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:519.8
Aggregation rules
Group decision making
Fuzzy opinions
Investigación operativa (Matemáticas)
1207 Investigación Operativa
id ES_e98ab2e4f497d6336f0f50de4872c8e2
oai_identifier_str oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/60897
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Single-Peakedness in Weighted Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Fuzzy GroupMontero De Juan, Francisco Javier519.8Aggregation rulesGroup decision makingFuzzy opinionsInvestigación operativa (Matemáticas)1207 Investigación OperativaIn this paper it is considered a formal approach to the problem of aggregating individual opinions in a fuzzy group, when alternatives can be represented in a real hyper-space and each individual defines his/her fuzzy set of non rejectable alternatives. On one hand, weighted aggregation rule for consensus opinion is axiomatically justified. On the other hand, it is shown a sufficient condition for the stability of such consensus solution.SpringerKacprzyk, JanuszFedrizzi, MarioUniversidad Complutense de Madrid19901990-01-0119901990-01-01book parthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/60897reponame:Docta Complutenseinstname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/608972026-06-02T12:44:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Single-Peakedness in Weighted Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Fuzzy Group
title Single-Peakedness in Weighted Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Fuzzy Group
spellingShingle Single-Peakedness in Weighted Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Fuzzy Group
Montero De Juan, Francisco Javier
519.8
Aggregation rules
Group decision making
Fuzzy opinions
Investigación operativa (Matemáticas)
1207 Investigación Operativa
title_short Single-Peakedness in Weighted Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Fuzzy Group
title_full Single-Peakedness in Weighted Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Fuzzy Group
title_fullStr Single-Peakedness in Weighted Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Fuzzy Group
title_full_unstemmed Single-Peakedness in Weighted Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Fuzzy Group
title_sort Single-Peakedness in Weighted Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Fuzzy Group
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Montero De Juan, Francisco Javier
author Montero De Juan, Francisco Javier
author_facet Montero De Juan, Francisco Javier
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Kacprzyk, Janusz
Fedrizzi, Mario
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv 519.8
Aggregation rules
Group decision making
Fuzzy opinions
Investigación operativa (Matemáticas)
1207 Investigación Operativa
topic 519.8
Aggregation rules
Group decision making
Fuzzy opinions
Investigación operativa (Matemáticas)
1207 Investigación Operativa
description In this paper it is considered a formal approach to the problem of aggregating individual opinions in a fuzzy group, when alternatives can be represented in a real hyper-space and each individual defines his/her fuzzy set of non rejectable alternatives. On one hand, weighted aggregation rule for consensus opinion is axiomatically justified. On the other hand, it is shown a sufficient condition for the stability of such consensus solution.
publishDate 1990
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1990
1990-01-01
1990
1990-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv book part
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
format bookPart
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/60897
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/60897
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Docta Complutense
instname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
instname_str Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
reponame_str Docta Complutense
collection Docta Complutense
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869423060976664576
score 15,301603

Similares en LA Referencia