First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopes

The purpose of the present study was to clinically evaluate two new single-use Pusen ureteroscopes, one semirigid with a flexible tip (srURS) and one flexible (fURS). During ten consecutive procedures (five srURS and five fURS), we subjectively evaluated on a scale from 0 (poor) to 10 (excellent), t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Emiliani, Esteban|||0000-0003-4488-0022, Mercadé, Asier, Millan, Félix, Sánchez Martín, Francisco María|||0000-0002-9198-8717, Konstantinidis Garay, Cristián, Angerri Feu, Oriol|||0000-0003-3363-6585
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:227969
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/227969
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5173/ceju.2018.1620
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Ureteroscopy
Urolithiasis
Single-use ureteroscope
Flexible ureteroscope
Semirigid ureteroscope
Pusen
id ES_e8b7920d53a3301a8f7d1c8cf105b0c6
oai_identifier_str oai:ddd.uab.cat:227969
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopesEmiliani, Esteban|||0000-0003-4488-0022Mercadé, AsierMillan, FélixSánchez Martín, Francisco María|||0000-0002-9198-8717Konstantinidis Garay, CristiánAngerri Feu, Oriol|||0000-0003-3363-6585UreteroscopyUrolithiasisSingle-use ureteroscopeFlexible ureteroscopeSemirigid ureteroscopePusenThe purpose of the present study was to clinically evaluate two new single-use Pusen ureteroscopes, one semirigid with a flexible tip (srURS) and one flexible (fURS). During ten consecutive procedures (five srURS and five fURS), we subjectively evaluated on a scale from 0 (poor) to 10 (excellent), the scope's deflection, image quality, and maneuverability prior to, during and after the surgery. Patient demographics, complications with the devices, and troubleshooting were recorded. There were a total of ten patients, five of which were female while the other five were male. Mean age was 58.9 years. Seven patients had a single kidney stone with mean size of 9.6 mm (1.6-20 mm). Half of the patients were pre-stented. For the fURS, the preoperative image quality rating was 8.4 (8-10), compared with 6.8 (4-9) during surgery. The preoperative deflection rating was 9.6+ 0.9 (8-10), while during surgery this decreased to 8.0 (6-10) and to 6.0 (4-8) when using a laser fiber. The srURS had a preoperative image quality rating of 9.2 (8-10), which decreased to 7.6 (6-9) while using the scope. The deflection rating decreased from 9.4 (7-10) preoperatively to 7.0 (1-10) postoperatively, and a similar reduction was observed in the maneuverability rating, from 9.6 (8-10) to 7.4 (1-10). Ureteroscopy was considered as a standard in four of the fURS and three of the srURS procedures. The mean overall satisfaction rating was 6. The two new single-use ureteroscopes, one flexible and one semirigid, were considered to have allowed standard ureteroscopy in four and three out of the five procedures for each scope, respectively. The image quality, deflection, and maneuverability ratings decreased during the procedure for both scopes. 22018-01-0120182018-01-01Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ddd.uab.cat/record/227969https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5173/ceju.2018.1620reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UABinstname:Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra, i la creació d'obres derivades, sempre que no sigui amb finalitats comercials i que es distribueixin sota la mateixa llicència que regula l'obra original. Cal que es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ddd.uab.cat:2279692026-06-06T12:50:31Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopes
title First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopes
spellingShingle First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopes
Emiliani, Esteban|||0000-0003-4488-0022
Ureteroscopy
Urolithiasis
Single-use ureteroscope
Flexible ureteroscope
Semirigid ureteroscope
Pusen
title_short First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopes
title_full First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopes
title_fullStr First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopes
title_full_unstemmed First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopes
title_sort First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopes
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Emiliani, Esteban|||0000-0003-4488-0022
Mercadé, Asier
Millan, Félix
Sánchez Martín, Francisco María|||0000-0002-9198-8717
Konstantinidis Garay, Cristián
Angerri Feu, Oriol|||0000-0003-3363-6585
author Emiliani, Esteban|||0000-0003-4488-0022
author_facet Emiliani, Esteban|||0000-0003-4488-0022
Mercadé, Asier
Millan, Félix
Sánchez Martín, Francisco María|||0000-0002-9198-8717
Konstantinidis Garay, Cristián
Angerri Feu, Oriol|||0000-0003-3363-6585
author_role author
author2 Mercadé, Asier
Millan, Félix
Sánchez Martín, Francisco María|||0000-0002-9198-8717
Konstantinidis Garay, Cristián
Angerri Feu, Oriol|||0000-0003-3363-6585
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ureteroscopy
Urolithiasis
Single-use ureteroscope
Flexible ureteroscope
Semirigid ureteroscope
Pusen
topic Ureteroscopy
Urolithiasis
Single-use ureteroscope
Flexible ureteroscope
Semirigid ureteroscope
Pusen
description The purpose of the present study was to clinically evaluate two new single-use Pusen ureteroscopes, one semirigid with a flexible tip (srURS) and one flexible (fURS). During ten consecutive procedures (five srURS and five fURS), we subjectively evaluated on a scale from 0 (poor) to 10 (excellent), the scope's deflection, image quality, and maneuverability prior to, during and after the surgery. Patient demographics, complications with the devices, and troubleshooting were recorded. There were a total of ten patients, five of which were female while the other five were male. Mean age was 58.9 years. Seven patients had a single kidney stone with mean size of 9.6 mm (1.6-20 mm). Half of the patients were pre-stented. For the fURS, the preoperative image quality rating was 8.4 (8-10), compared with 6.8 (4-9) during surgery. The preoperative deflection rating was 9.6+ 0.9 (8-10), while during surgery this decreased to 8.0 (6-10) and to 6.0 (4-8) when using a laser fiber. The srURS had a preoperative image quality rating of 9.2 (8-10), which decreased to 7.6 (6-9) while using the scope. The deflection rating decreased from 9.4 (7-10) preoperatively to 7.0 (1-10) postoperatively, and a similar reduction was observed in the maneuverability rating, from 9.6 (8-10) to 7.4 (1-10). Ureteroscopy was considered as a standard in four of the fURS and three of the srURS procedures. The mean overall satisfaction rating was 6. The two new single-use ureteroscopes, one flexible and one semirigid, were considered to have allowed standard ureteroscopy in four and three out of the five procedures for each scope, respectively. The image quality, deflection, and maneuverability ratings decreased during the procedure for both scopes.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2
2018-01-01
2018
2018-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ddd.uab.cat/record/227969
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5173/ceju.2018.1620
url https://ddd.uab.cat/record/227969
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5173/ceju.2018.1620
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
instname:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
instname_str Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
collection Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869422965797421056
score 15.198674

Similares en LA Referencia