A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort

Purpose: About 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30% in contrast to 90% for local disease. This has prompted search for early detection biomarkers. For initial testing, specimens taken months or years before ovarian cancer diagnosis are the best so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Terry, Kathryn L., Schock, Helena, Fortner, Renée T., Hüsing, Anika, Fichorova, Raina N., Yamamoto, Hidemi S., Vitonis, Allison F., Johnson, Theron, Overvad, Kim, Tjønneland, Anne, Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine, Mesrine, Sylvie, Severi, Gianluca, Dossus, Laure, Rinaldi, Sabina, Boeing, Heiner, Benetou, Vassiliki, Lagiou, Pagona, Trichopoulou, Antonia, Krogh, Vittorio, Kuhn, Elisabetta, Panico, Salvatore, Bueno de Mesquita, H. Bas, Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte, Peeters, Petra H. M., Torhild Gram, Inger, Weiderpass, Elisabete, Duell, Eric J., Sánchez, María José, Ardanaz, Eva, Etxezarreta, Nerea, Navarro, Carmen, Idahl, Annika, Lundin, Eva, Jirström, Karin, Manjer, Jonas, Wareham, Nicholas J., Khaw, Kay-Tee, Smith-Byrne, Karl, Travis, Ruth C., Gunter, Marc J., Merritt, Melissa A., Riboli, Elio, Cramer, Daniel W., Kaaks, Rudolf
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/125704
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/125704
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Càncer d'ovari
Marcadors bioquímics
Ovarian cancer
Biochemical markers
id ES_e8a3accfa0323548cc5f736168178d5f
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:2445/125704
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohortTerry, Kathryn L.Schock, HelenaFortner, Renée T.Hüsing, AnikaFichorova, Raina N.Yamamoto, Hidemi S.Vitonis, Allison F.Johnson, TheronOvervad, KimTjønneland, AnneBoutron-Ruault, Marie-ChristineMesrine, SylvieSeveri, GianlucaDossus, LaureRinaldi, SabinaBoeing, HeinerBenetou, VassilikiLagiou, PagonaTrichopoulou, AntoniaKrogh, VittorioKuhn, ElisabettaPanico, SalvatoreBueno de Mesquita, H. BasOnland-Moret, N. CharlottePeeters, Petra H. M.Torhild Gram, IngerWeiderpass, ElisabeteDuell, Eric J.Sánchez, María JoséArdanaz, EvaEtxezarreta, NereaNavarro, CarmenIdahl, AnnikaLundin, EvaJirström, KarinManjer, JonasWareham, Nicholas J.Khaw, Kay-TeeSmith-Byrne, KarlTravis, Ruth C.Gunter, Marc J.Merritt, Melissa A.Riboli, ElioCramer, Daniel W.Kaaks, RudolfCàncer d'ovariMarcadors bioquímicsOvarian cancerBiochemical markersPurpose: About 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30% in contrast to 90% for local disease. This has prompted search for early detection biomarkers. For initial testing, specimens taken months or years before ovarian cancer diagnosis are the best source of information to evaluate earlydetection biomarkers. Here we evaluate the most promising ovarian cancer screening biomarkers in prospectively collected samples from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Experimental Design: We measured CA125, HE4, CA72.4, and CA15.3 in 810 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,939 controls. We calculated the sensitivity at 95% and 98% specificity as well as area under the receiver operator curve (C-statistic) for each marker individually and in combination. In addition, we evaluated marker performance by stage at diagnosis and time between blood draw and diagnosis. Results: We observed the best discrimination between cases and controls within 6 months of diagnosis for CA125 (C-statistic = 0.92), then HE4 (0.84), CA72.4 (0.77), and CA15.3 (0.73). Marker performance declined with longer time between blood draw and diagnosis and for earlier staged disease. However, assessment of discriminatory ability at early stage was limited by small numbers. Combinations of markers performed modestly, but significantly better than any single marker. Conclusions: CA125 remains the single best marker for the early detection of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, but can be slightly improved by combining with other markers. Identifying novel markers for ovarian cancer will require studies including larger numbers of early-stage cases. (C) 2016 AACR.American Association for Cancer Research2018201820162018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion23 p.application/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/125704Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316Clinical Cancer Research, 2016, vol. 22, num. 18, p. 4664-4675https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316(c) American Association for Cancer Research, 2016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:2445/1257042026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort
title A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort
spellingShingle A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort
Terry, Kathryn L.
Càncer d'ovari
Marcadors bioquímics
Ovarian cancer
Biochemical markers
title_short A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort
title_full A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort
title_fullStr A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort
title_full_unstemmed A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort
title_sort A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Terry, Kathryn L.
Schock, Helena
Fortner, Renée T.
Hüsing, Anika
Fichorova, Raina N.
Yamamoto, Hidemi S.
Vitonis, Allison F.
Johnson, Theron
Overvad, Kim
Tjønneland, Anne
Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine
Mesrine, Sylvie
Severi, Gianluca
Dossus, Laure
Rinaldi, Sabina
Boeing, Heiner
Benetou, Vassiliki
Lagiou, Pagona
Trichopoulou, Antonia
Krogh, Vittorio
Kuhn, Elisabetta
Panico, Salvatore
Bueno de Mesquita, H. Bas
Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
Peeters, Petra H. M.
Torhild Gram, Inger
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Duell, Eric J.
Sánchez, María José
Ardanaz, Eva
Etxezarreta, Nerea
Navarro, Carmen
Idahl, Annika
Lundin, Eva
Jirström, Karin
Manjer, Jonas
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Khaw, Kay-Tee
Smith-Byrne, Karl
Travis, Ruth C.
Gunter, Marc J.
Merritt, Melissa A.
Riboli, Elio
Cramer, Daniel W.
Kaaks, Rudolf
author Terry, Kathryn L.
author_facet Terry, Kathryn L.
Schock, Helena
Fortner, Renée T.
Hüsing, Anika
Fichorova, Raina N.
Yamamoto, Hidemi S.
Vitonis, Allison F.
Johnson, Theron
Overvad, Kim
Tjønneland, Anne
Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine
Mesrine, Sylvie
Severi, Gianluca
Dossus, Laure
Rinaldi, Sabina
Boeing, Heiner
Benetou, Vassiliki
Lagiou, Pagona
Trichopoulou, Antonia
Krogh, Vittorio
Kuhn, Elisabetta
Panico, Salvatore
Bueno de Mesquita, H. Bas
Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
Peeters, Petra H. M.
Torhild Gram, Inger
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Duell, Eric J.
Sánchez, María José
Ardanaz, Eva
Etxezarreta, Nerea
Navarro, Carmen
Idahl, Annika
Lundin, Eva
Jirström, Karin
Manjer, Jonas
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Khaw, Kay-Tee
Smith-Byrne, Karl
Travis, Ruth C.
Gunter, Marc J.
Merritt, Melissa A.
Riboli, Elio
Cramer, Daniel W.
Kaaks, Rudolf
author_role author
author2 Schock, Helena
Fortner, Renée T.
Hüsing, Anika
Fichorova, Raina N.
Yamamoto, Hidemi S.
Vitonis, Allison F.
Johnson, Theron
Overvad, Kim
Tjønneland, Anne
Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine
Mesrine, Sylvie
Severi, Gianluca
Dossus, Laure
Rinaldi, Sabina
Boeing, Heiner
Benetou, Vassiliki
Lagiou, Pagona
Trichopoulou, Antonia
Krogh, Vittorio
Kuhn, Elisabetta
Panico, Salvatore
Bueno de Mesquita, H. Bas
Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
Peeters, Petra H. M.
Torhild Gram, Inger
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Duell, Eric J.
Sánchez, María José
Ardanaz, Eva
Etxezarreta, Nerea
Navarro, Carmen
Idahl, Annika
Lundin, Eva
Jirström, Karin
Manjer, Jonas
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Khaw, Kay-Tee
Smith-Byrne, Karl
Travis, Ruth C.
Gunter, Marc J.
Merritt, Melissa A.
Riboli, Elio
Cramer, Daniel W.
Kaaks, Rudolf
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Càncer d'ovari
Marcadors bioquímics
Ovarian cancer
Biochemical markers
topic Càncer d'ovari
Marcadors bioquímics
Ovarian cancer
Biochemical markers
description Purpose: About 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30% in contrast to 90% for local disease. This has prompted search for early detection biomarkers. For initial testing, specimens taken months or years before ovarian cancer diagnosis are the best source of information to evaluate earlydetection biomarkers. Here we evaluate the most promising ovarian cancer screening biomarkers in prospectively collected samples from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Experimental Design: We measured CA125, HE4, CA72.4, and CA15.3 in 810 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,939 controls. We calculated the sensitivity at 95% and 98% specificity as well as area under the receiver operator curve (C-statistic) for each marker individually and in combination. In addition, we evaluated marker performance by stage at diagnosis and time between blood draw and diagnosis. Results: We observed the best discrimination between cases and controls within 6 months of diagnosis for CA125 (C-statistic = 0.92), then HE4 (0.84), CA72.4 (0.77), and CA15.3 (0.73). Marker performance declined with longer time between blood draw and diagnosis and for earlier staged disease. However, assessment of discriminatory ability at early stage was limited by small numbers. Combinations of markers performed modestly, but significantly better than any single marker. Conclusions: CA125 remains the single best marker for the early detection of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, but can be slightly improved by combining with other markers. Identifying novel markers for ovarian cancer will require studies including larger numbers of early-stage cases. (C) 2016 AACR.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2018
2018
2018
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2445/125704
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/125704
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316
Clinical Cancer Research, 2016, vol. 22, num. 18, p. 4664-4675
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv (c) American Association for Cancer Research, 2016
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv (c) American Association for Cancer Research, 2016
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 23 p.
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Association for Cancer Research
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Association for Cancer Research
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869422959268986880
score 15,811543