To agree or to agree to disagree: that is the question
The goal of the paper is to offer a characterisation of different ways of using the terms agreement and disagreement and to assess disagreements where subjects take themselves to instantiate the epistemic peerage relation. A distinction between merely verbal and substantive disagreement is put forth...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2012 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de la UB |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/154493 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/154493 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Filosofia analítica Filosofia del llenguatge Analysis (Philosophy) Philosophy of language |
| Sumario: | The goal of the paper is to offer a characterisation of different ways of using the terms agreement and disagreement and to assess disagreements where subjects take themselves to instantiate the epistemic peerage relation. A distinction between merely verbal and substantive disagreement is put forth. A criticism of two popular solutions to the problem of epistemic peer disagreement is advanced |
|---|