From supercontinent to superplate: Late Paleozoic Pangea's inner deformation suggests it was a short-lived superplate

The supercontinent cycle explains how landmasses amalgamate into supercontinents that dismember after a ~ 100 Myr tenure in a quasi-periodic manner. Supercontinents are thought to be rigid superplates whose formation controls many of the Earth's secular variations, from long-term climate trends...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Pastor-Galán, Daniel
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositorio:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/344630
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/344630
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85123183571
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Orocline | Paleotethys | Pangea | Permian | Rheic | Supercontinent | Superplate
id ES_e87e723f016d925dff5819d3f3cf0add
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.csic.es:10261/344630
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling From supercontinent to superplate: Late Paleozoic Pangea's inner deformation suggests it was a short-lived superplatePastor-Galán, DanielOrocline | Paleotethys | Pangea | Permian | Rheic | Supercontinent | SuperplateThe supercontinent cycle explains how landmasses amalgamate into supercontinents that dismember after a ~ 100 Myr tenure in a quasi-periodic manner. Supercontinents are thought to be rigid superplates whose formation controls many of the Earth's secular variations, from long-term climate trends to global mantle circulation. Pangea, the latest continental superplate, formed ~330 Ma, began to rift ~240 Ma, finally broke-up ~200 Ma, is generally considered the template for all previous supercontinents. The existence of Pangea as a superplate at ~330 Ma is inconsistent with: (i) the kinematic constraints of the continent-continent collision that became progressively younger westwards and it only ended in the early Permian times in its westernmost side; (ii) the widespread ‘post-orogenic’ magmatism in the core of Pangea and the hot high-pressure metamorphism in the Paleotethys; and (iii) the global paleomagnetic database that shows paleolatitudinal overlaps between the participating continents, and significant vertical axis rotations in the core of Pangea between 330 and 270 Ma, which suggests >1500 km of shortening and extension. Here I present a tectonic reconstruction that reconciles the paleomagnetic and geological discrepancies. In this model, after the initial amalgamation of Pangea as a landmass, the comprising plates kept on interacting between each other and the asthenosphere during the late Carboniferous and early Permian (320–270 Ma) instead of being a rigid plate. After that and concomitant with a plate reorganization, Pangea finally established as a superplate for a brief period of <70 Myr. This superplate tenure might be, following most recent models, too short to control the global mantle circulation.Thorough and constructive reviews by J. Brendan Murphy and an anonymous reviewer improved greatly this paper. I would like to acknowledge (in alphabetical order) Mark Dekkers, John Geissman, Gabriel Guti´errez-Alonso, Stephen Johnston, Cor Langereis, Patrick Meere, Tatsuki Tsujimori, and Rob van der Voo for endless discussions about the reconstruction. This paper is a contribution to UNESCO's IGCP 648: Supercontinent Cycles & Global Geodynamics project and it is dedicated to the career of Rob van der Voo. This work has been funded by a post-doctoral fellowship from The Netherlands Research Centre for Integrated Solid Earth Sciences (ISES), a fellowship for overseas researchers from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) (grant P16329) and a MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI Grant (JP16F16329) and a Ramon ´ y Cajal Fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. I especially thank all the beats Charles Robert Watts has ever made. The author declares no competing interest.Peer reviewedElsevierMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)Pastor-Galán, Daniel [0000-0002-0226-2739]Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]202420242022info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/344630https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85123183571reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)InglésEarth-Science ReviewsSíinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/3446302026-05-22T06:33:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From supercontinent to superplate: Late Paleozoic Pangea's inner deformation suggests it was a short-lived superplate
title From supercontinent to superplate: Late Paleozoic Pangea's inner deformation suggests it was a short-lived superplate
spellingShingle From supercontinent to superplate: Late Paleozoic Pangea's inner deformation suggests it was a short-lived superplate
Pastor-Galán, Daniel
Orocline | Paleotethys | Pangea | Permian | Rheic | Supercontinent | Superplate
title_short From supercontinent to superplate: Late Paleozoic Pangea's inner deformation suggests it was a short-lived superplate
title_full From supercontinent to superplate: Late Paleozoic Pangea's inner deformation suggests it was a short-lived superplate
title_fullStr From supercontinent to superplate: Late Paleozoic Pangea's inner deformation suggests it was a short-lived superplate
title_full_unstemmed From supercontinent to superplate: Late Paleozoic Pangea's inner deformation suggests it was a short-lived superplate
title_sort From supercontinent to superplate: Late Paleozoic Pangea's inner deformation suggests it was a short-lived superplate
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pastor-Galán, Daniel
author Pastor-Galán, Daniel
author_facet Pastor-Galán, Daniel
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)
Pastor-Galán, Daniel [0000-0002-0226-2739]
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Orocline | Paleotethys | Pangea | Permian | Rheic | Supercontinent | Superplate
topic Orocline | Paleotethys | Pangea | Permian | Rheic | Supercontinent | Superplate
description The supercontinent cycle explains how landmasses amalgamate into supercontinents that dismember after a ~ 100 Myr tenure in a quasi-periodic manner. Supercontinents are thought to be rigid superplates whose formation controls many of the Earth's secular variations, from long-term climate trends to global mantle circulation. Pangea, the latest continental superplate, formed ~330 Ma, began to rift ~240 Ma, finally broke-up ~200 Ma, is generally considered the template for all previous supercontinents. The existence of Pangea as a superplate at ~330 Ma is inconsistent with: (i) the kinematic constraints of the continent-continent collision that became progressively younger westwards and it only ended in the early Permian times in its westernmost side; (ii) the widespread ‘post-orogenic’ magmatism in the core of Pangea and the hot high-pressure metamorphism in the Paleotethys; and (iii) the global paleomagnetic database that shows paleolatitudinal overlaps between the participating continents, and significant vertical axis rotations in the core of Pangea between 330 and 270 Ma, which suggests >1500 km of shortening and extension. Here I present a tectonic reconstruction that reconciles the paleomagnetic and geological discrepancies. In this model, after the initial amalgamation of Pangea as a landmass, the comprising plates kept on interacting between each other and the asthenosphere during the late Carboniferous and early Permian (320–270 Ma) instead of being a rigid plate. After that and concomitant with a plate reorganization, Pangea finally established as a superplate for a brief period of <70 Myr. This superplate tenure might be, following most recent models, too short to control the global mantle circulation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Publisher's version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10261/344630
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85123183571
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/344630
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85123183571
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Earth-Science Reviews

dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
instname_str Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
reponame_str DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
collection DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869422947129622528
score 15,812429