On the position of dative DPs in Spanish middle-passive sentences
This paper examines external possession between a dative possessor and a relational noun in Spanish middle-passive configurations. The dative DP in these contexts must surface preverbally in out-of-the-blue contexts, either by itself -presumably in preverbal subject position-, or along with the them...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:304766 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/304766 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5565/rev/isogloss.393 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Middle-passive Clitic-left dislocation Dative arguments Locality |
| Sumario: | This paper examines external possession between a dative possessor and a relational noun in Spanish middle-passive configurations. The dative DP in these contexts must surface preverbally in out-of-the-blue contexts, either by itself -presumably in preverbal subject position-, or along with the theme containing the possessee. When the dative precedes the theme, it cannot be assumed that the former is left-dislocated while the latter sits in preverbal subject position, for this would imply a violation of locality under a low applicative analysis of dative possessors: Tº would skip the possessor argument in Spec,ApplP to probe the possessee in Applº's complement position to its specifier. Rather, I provide data showing that preverbal DPs -dative or otherwise- in Spanish middle-passive contexts are clitic left-dislocations co-referring with empty pronouns in argument position. I offer a biclausal analysis of these configurations that avoids any potential intervention effects, while at the same time accounting for the extra-sentential properties of these constituents. |
|---|