Is the Surgical Drainage Mandatory for Leak after Sleeve Gastrectomy?
Introduction: Despite the unanimous acknowledgement of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) worldwide, the leak remains its deficiency. For the last decade, the surgical treatment was practically considered mandatory for almost any collection following LSG. The aim of this study is to evaluate...
| Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repository: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Language: | English |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:272452 |
| Online Access: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/272452 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.3390/jcm12041376 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Sleeve gastrectomy Endoscopy Surgical drainage Double pigtail Septotomy |
| id |
ES_e77feded1f05cb59096720065fa5bd4b |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ddd.uab.cat:272452 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Is the Surgical Drainage Mandatory for Leak after Sleeve Gastrectomy?Nedelcu, MariusManos, ThierryNoel, PatrickDanan, MarcZulian, ViolaVilallonga, Ramon|||0000-0001-9333-2765Nedelcu, AnamariaCarandina, Sergio|||0000-0003-0651-5606Sleeve gastrectomyEndoscopySurgical drainageDouble pigtailSeptotomyIntroduction: Despite the unanimous acknowledgement of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) worldwide, the leak remains its deficiency. For the last decade, the surgical treatment was practically considered mandatory for almost any collection following LSG. The aim of this study is to evaluate the need for surgical drainage for leak following LSG. Methods: All consecutive patients having gone through LSG from January 2017 to December 2020 were enrolled in our study. Once the demographic data and the leak history were registered, we analyzed the outcome of the surgical or endoscopic drainage, the characteristics of the endoscopic treatment, and the evolution to complete healing. Results: A total of 1249 patients underwent LSG and the leak occurred in 11 cases (0.9%). There were 10 women with a mean age of 47.8 years (27-63). The surgical drainage was performed for three patients and the rest of the eight patients underwent primary endoscopic treatment. The endoscopic treatment was represented with pigtails for seven cases and septotomy with balloon dilation for four cases. In two out of these four cases, the septotomy was anticipated by the use of a nasocavitary drain for 2 weeks. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 3.2 (range 2-6). The leaks achieved complete healing after an average duration of 4.8 months (range 1-9 months). No mortality was recorded for a leak. Conclusions: The treatment of the gastric leak must be tailored to each patient. Although there is still no consensus for the endoscopic drainage of leaks after LSG, the surgical approach can be avoided in up to 72%. The benefits of pigtails and nasocavitary drains followed by endoscopic septotomy are undeniable, and they should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric center. 22023-01-0120232023-01-01Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ddd.uab.cat/record/272452https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.3390/jcm12041376reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UABinstname:Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ddd.uab.cat:2724522026-06-06T12:50:31Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is the Surgical Drainage Mandatory for Leak after Sleeve Gastrectomy? |
| title |
Is the Surgical Drainage Mandatory for Leak after Sleeve Gastrectomy? |
| spellingShingle |
Is the Surgical Drainage Mandatory for Leak after Sleeve Gastrectomy? Nedelcu, Marius Sleeve gastrectomy Endoscopy Surgical drainage Double pigtail Septotomy |
| title_short |
Is the Surgical Drainage Mandatory for Leak after Sleeve Gastrectomy? |
| title_full |
Is the Surgical Drainage Mandatory for Leak after Sleeve Gastrectomy? |
| title_fullStr |
Is the Surgical Drainage Mandatory for Leak after Sleeve Gastrectomy? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Is the Surgical Drainage Mandatory for Leak after Sleeve Gastrectomy? |
| title_sort |
Is the Surgical Drainage Mandatory for Leak after Sleeve Gastrectomy? |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Nedelcu, Marius Manos, Thierry Noel, Patrick Danan, Marc Zulian, Viola Vilallonga, Ramon|||0000-0001-9333-2765 Nedelcu, Anamaria Carandina, Sergio|||0000-0003-0651-5606 |
| author |
Nedelcu, Marius |
| author_facet |
Nedelcu, Marius Manos, Thierry Noel, Patrick Danan, Marc Zulian, Viola Vilallonga, Ramon|||0000-0001-9333-2765 Nedelcu, Anamaria Carandina, Sergio|||0000-0003-0651-5606 |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Manos, Thierry Noel, Patrick Danan, Marc Zulian, Viola Vilallonga, Ramon|||0000-0001-9333-2765 Nedelcu, Anamaria Carandina, Sergio|||0000-0003-0651-5606 |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Sleeve gastrectomy Endoscopy Surgical drainage Double pigtail Septotomy |
| topic |
Sleeve gastrectomy Endoscopy Surgical drainage Double pigtail Septotomy |
| description |
Introduction: Despite the unanimous acknowledgement of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) worldwide, the leak remains its deficiency. For the last decade, the surgical treatment was practically considered mandatory for almost any collection following LSG. The aim of this study is to evaluate the need for surgical drainage for leak following LSG. Methods: All consecutive patients having gone through LSG from January 2017 to December 2020 were enrolled in our study. Once the demographic data and the leak history were registered, we analyzed the outcome of the surgical or endoscopic drainage, the characteristics of the endoscopic treatment, and the evolution to complete healing. Results: A total of 1249 patients underwent LSG and the leak occurred in 11 cases (0.9%). There were 10 women with a mean age of 47.8 years (27-63). The surgical drainage was performed for three patients and the rest of the eight patients underwent primary endoscopic treatment. The endoscopic treatment was represented with pigtails for seven cases and septotomy with balloon dilation for four cases. In two out of these four cases, the septotomy was anticipated by the use of a nasocavitary drain for 2 weeks. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 3.2 (range 2-6). The leaks achieved complete healing after an average duration of 4.8 months (range 1-9 months). No mortality was recorded for a leak. Conclusions: The treatment of the gastric leak must be tailored to each patient. Although there is still no consensus for the endoscopic drainage of leaks after LSG, the surgical approach can be avoided in up to 72%. The benefits of pigtails and nasocavitary drains followed by endoscopic septotomy are undeniable, and they should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric center. |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2 2023-01-01 2023 2023-01-01 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
Article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 VoR http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ddd.uab.cat/record/272452 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.3390/jcm12041376 |
| url |
https://ddd.uab.cat/record/272452 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.3390/jcm12041376 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés eng |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
open access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
open access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB instname:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| instname_str |
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| reponame_str |
Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| collection |
Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869422860429164544 |
| score |
15,301603 |