Microwire vs. Micro-Ribbon Magnetoelastic Sensors for Vibration-Based Structural Health Monitoring of Rectangular Concrete Beams
Two different magnetoelastic Metglas materials with distinct shapes were compared as sensing elements for the structural health monitoring of concrete beams. One had a ribbon shape, while the other had a microwire shape. The sensing elements were attached to different concrete beams, and a crack was...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/396647 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/396647 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Magnetoelastic materials Microwires Vibration sensors Concrete structures Damage detection |
| Sumario: | Two different magnetoelastic Metglas materials with distinct shapes were compared as sensing elements for the structural health monitoring of concrete beams. One had a ribbon shape, while the other had a microwire shape. The sensing elements were attached to different concrete beams, and a crack was introduced into each beam. The beams were subjected to flexural vibrations, and their deformations were recorded wirelessly by coils, detecting the magnetic signals emitted due to the magnetoelastic nature of the sensors. Fast Fourier Analysis of the received signal revealed the bending mode frequencies of the beams, which serve as a “signature” of their structural health. In these spectra, the ribbon-shaped sensor exhibited a 1.4-times stronger signal than the microwire sensor. However, the extracted mode frequencies were nearly identical, with differences of less than 1% both before and after damage. This indicates that both sensors can be used equivalently to monitor structural damage in concrete beams. The damage-related relative frequency shifts ranged from −0.01 to −0.03, with similar results for both sensors. Thermal annealing was also studied and appeared to significantly enhance the signal by 10–30%, likely due to the relaxation of internal stresses induced during the rapid solidification synthesis of these materials. This enhancement was more pronounced in the ribbon-shaped sensor. This study is the first to utilize a magnetoelastic microwire sensor for damage detection in concrete beams. |
|---|