Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly

[EN] Objectives To understand who are the participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly. Design Systematic review of qualitative studies. Data sources The following databases were consulted: Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SciELO (from th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Serrano Gemes, Gema, Rich Ruiz, Manuel, Serrano del Rosal, Rafael
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Institución:Universidad de León
Repositorio:BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León
OAI Identifier:oai:buleria.unileon.es:10612/22802
Acceso en línea:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/3/e036551
https://hdl.handle.net/10612/22802
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Enfermería
Geriatric medicine
id ES_e62b99f6261fc7ee67d52fdd4ee6acd9
oai_identifier_str oai:buleria.unileon.es:10612/22802
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderlySerrano Gemes, GemaRich Ruiz, ManuelSerrano del Rosal, RafaelEnfermeríaGeriatric medicine[EN] Objectives To understand who are the participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly. Design Systematic review of qualitative studies. Data sources The following databases were consulted: Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SciELO (from the beginning until 29 November 2017). The bibliographical references in the studies that were finally included in the review were also searched. Study selection The studies had to deal with the decision-making process (already experienced by the participants) on the location of care of the elderly (adults who are 65 or older), had to use a qualitative methodology and had to be written in English or Spanish. Data extraction and synthesis A data extraction tool was used. Data analysis was conducted through the constant comparative method from Glaser and Strauss’ grounded theory. Results 46 studies were included in this review. Most of them were carried out in the USA, and in 21 of them the study population focused exclusively on the elderly. This review has found that there are many participants, with different roles and degrees of involvement, who may act jointly, separately or sequentially. These participants may be: the elders, family members, professionals and other relevant. Conclusions The main result of this review has been the variability found on how this decision is made, even varying the way of acting/perceiving the situation of the involved persons on certain occasions, simply due to the influence of some of the other groups of participants studied. Besides, this review has focused its results on the main participant in this process, the elders and how their family members interact with them when it comes to making this decision. This has allowed relevant results to be obtained about roles and degrees of involvement.SIBMJ Publishing GroupEnfermeriaFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud2020info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/3/e036551https://hdl.handle.net/10612/22802reponame:BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Leóninstname:Universidad de LeónInglésCRD42018084826.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:buleria.unileon.es:10612/228022026-06-24T12:43:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly
title Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly
spellingShingle Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly
Serrano Gemes, Gema
Enfermería
Geriatric medicine
title_short Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly
title_full Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly
title_fullStr Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly
title_sort Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Serrano Gemes, Gema
Rich Ruiz, Manuel
Serrano del Rosal, Rafael
author Serrano Gemes, Gema
author_facet Serrano Gemes, Gema
Rich Ruiz, Manuel
Serrano del Rosal, Rafael
author_role author
author2 Rich Ruiz, Manuel
Serrano del Rosal, Rafael
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Enfermeria
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Enfermería
Geriatric medicine
topic Enfermería
Geriatric medicine
description [EN] Objectives To understand who are the participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly. Design Systematic review of qualitative studies. Data sources The following databases were consulted: Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SciELO (from the beginning until 29 November 2017). The bibliographical references in the studies that were finally included in the review were also searched. Study selection The studies had to deal with the decision-making process (already experienced by the participants) on the location of care of the elderly (adults who are 65 or older), had to use a qualitative methodology and had to be written in English or Spanish. Data extraction and synthesis A data extraction tool was used. Data analysis was conducted through the constant comparative method from Glaser and Strauss’ grounded theory. Results 46 studies were included in this review. Most of them were carried out in the USA, and in 21 of them the study population focused exclusively on the elderly. This review has found that there are many participants, with different roles and degrees of involvement, who may act jointly, separately or sequentially. These participants may be: the elders, family members, professionals and other relevant. Conclusions The main result of this review has been the variability found on how this decision is made, even varying the way of acting/perceiving the situation of the involved persons on certain occasions, simply due to the influence of some of the other groups of participants studied. Besides, this review has focused its results on the main participant in this process, the elders and how their family members interact with them when it comes to making this decision. This has allowed relevant results to be obtained about roles and degrees of involvement.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/3/e036551
https://hdl.handle.net/10612/22802
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/3/e036551
https://hdl.handle.net/10612/22802
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv CRD42018084826.
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMJ Publishing Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMJ Publishing Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León
instname:Universidad de León
instname_str Universidad de León
reponame_str BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León
collection BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869422743225630720
score 15,811543