The strange case of Narciso: Cirilo Villaverde’s politics

The political views and actions of Cirilo Villaverde have received short shrift in contemporary scholarship. The sketchiness has led to confusion about Villaverde’s politics. While much critical work has been devoted to the racial conundrum in “Cecilia Valdés”, to a large measure it has omitted anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Álvarez Amell, Diana
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Alcalá (UAH)
Repositorio:e_Buah Biblioteca Digital Universidad de Alcalá
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ebuah.uah.es:10017/33800
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10017/33800
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Cirilo Villaverde
Cuba
Narciso López
Política
Anexionismo
Independencia
Filibustero
Ideología
Siglo XIX
Estados Unidos
Romanticismo
Historia
Memoria
Politics
Annexationism
Independence
Filibuster
Ideology
19th century
United States
Romanticism
History
Memory
Arte
Literatura
Sociología
Filología
Art
Literature
Sociology
Philology
id ES_e5362ae381dc7bd6aa78ab6bdf2f2ee4
oai_identifier_str oai:ebuah.uah.es:10017/33800
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling The strange case of Narciso: Cirilo Villaverde’s politicsÁlvarez Amell, DianaCirilo VillaverdeCubaNarciso LópezPolíticaAnexionismoIndependenciaFilibusteroIdeologíaSiglo XIXEstados UnidosRomanticismoHistoriaMemoriaPoliticsAnnexationismIndependenceFilibusterIdeology19th centuryUnited StatesRomanticismHistoryMemoryArteHistoriaLiteraturaSociologíaFilologíaArtHistoryLiteratureSociologyPhilologyThe political views and actions of Cirilo Villaverde have received short shrift in contemporary scholarship. The sketchiness has led to confusion about Villaverde’s politics. While much critical work has been devoted to the racial conundrum in “Cecilia Valdés”, to a large measure it has omitted analysis of the author’s views on the wider issue of Cuba’s political fate. Notwithstanding Villaverde’s active involvement as a political actor, the ideas vehemently expressed in his political writings, he has been often identified, without great scrutiny to his writings, as an “anexionista”, in large part due to his association with Narciso López. Reading Villaverde’s writings, as well as those of other Cuban political actors of the time, makes the historical confusion that surrounds López and Villaverde’s political beliefs perplexing. Villaverde to the last defended his own belief in Cuban independence, and several times wrote in defense of López. Cubans and Americans have debated López’s intentions and Villaverde’s politics, either ignoring or disregarding original sources such as Villaverde’s published statements that are deemed unreliable, pointedly when they contradict or create fissures in the American historical grand narrative.Las opiniones y las actividades políticas de Cirilo Villaverde han recibido poca atención crítica. La parquedad o falta de atención crítica ha creado confusión acerca de cuáles eran sus posiciones políticas, caso curioso dado que Villaverde participó de manera activa en la política. Mientras que la crítica se ha concentrado casi con exclusividad en la política racial en su novela emblemática, “Cecilia Valdés”, ha dejado a un lado sus otros escritos periodísticos y novelas que pudieran esclarecer sus ideas sobre la situación política cubana en el siglo diecinueve. Debido a su colaboración política con el general Narciso López, se le ha atribuido a Villaverde el haber sido partidario del anexionismo, aunque luego se sostenga de manera confusa un cambio de opinión hacia el final de su vida. Cuando se analizan los textos de Villaverde y otros actores políticos de la época, causa perplejidad la confusión. Villaverde sostuvo por escrito a lo largo de toda su vida que siempre había estado en favor de la independencia cubana y negó con igual tenacidad el haber favorecido alguna vez el anexionismo. Sostuvo lo mismo de López. Es curiosa la omisión de estas fuentes originales, que se excluyen o se descartan como poco confiables, más aún cuando son testimonios directos que contradicen o crean fisuras en la narrativa histórica norteamericana.Instituto Franklin de Investigación en Estudios Norteamericanos, Universidad de Alcalá20172017-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501NAhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10017/33800reponame:e_Buah Biblioteca Digital Universidad de Alcaláinstname:Universidad de Alcalá (UAH)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ebuah.uah.es:10017/338002026-06-18T11:13:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The strange case of Narciso: Cirilo Villaverde’s politics
title The strange case of Narciso: Cirilo Villaverde’s politics
spellingShingle The strange case of Narciso: Cirilo Villaverde’s politics
Álvarez Amell, Diana
Cirilo Villaverde
Cuba
Narciso López
Política
Anexionismo
Independencia
Filibustero
Ideología
Siglo XIX
Estados Unidos
Romanticismo
Historia
Memoria
Politics
Annexationism
Independence
Filibuster
Ideology
19th century
United States
Romanticism
History
Memory
Arte
Historia
Literatura
Sociología
Filología
Art
History
Literature
Sociology
Philology
title_short The strange case of Narciso: Cirilo Villaverde’s politics
title_full The strange case of Narciso: Cirilo Villaverde’s politics
title_fullStr The strange case of Narciso: Cirilo Villaverde’s politics
title_full_unstemmed The strange case of Narciso: Cirilo Villaverde’s politics
title_sort The strange case of Narciso: Cirilo Villaverde’s politics
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Álvarez Amell, Diana
author Álvarez Amell, Diana
author_facet Álvarez Amell, Diana
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cirilo Villaverde
Cuba
Narciso López
Política
Anexionismo
Independencia
Filibustero
Ideología
Siglo XIX
Estados Unidos
Romanticismo
Historia
Memoria
Politics
Annexationism
Independence
Filibuster
Ideology
19th century
United States
Romanticism
History
Memory
Arte
Historia
Literatura
Sociología
Filología
Art
History
Literature
Sociology
Philology
topic Cirilo Villaverde
Cuba
Narciso López
Política
Anexionismo
Independencia
Filibustero
Ideología
Siglo XIX
Estados Unidos
Romanticismo
Historia
Memoria
Politics
Annexationism
Independence
Filibuster
Ideology
19th century
United States
Romanticism
History
Memory
Arte
Historia
Literatura
Sociología
Filología
Art
History
Literature
Sociology
Philology
description The political views and actions of Cirilo Villaverde have received short shrift in contemporary scholarship. The sketchiness has led to confusion about Villaverde’s politics. While much critical work has been devoted to the racial conundrum in “Cecilia Valdés”, to a large measure it has omitted analysis of the author’s views on the wider issue of Cuba’s political fate. Notwithstanding Villaverde’s active involvement as a political actor, the ideas vehemently expressed in his political writings, he has been often identified, without great scrutiny to his writings, as an “anexionista”, in large part due to his association with Narciso López. Reading Villaverde’s writings, as well as those of other Cuban political actors of the time, makes the historical confusion that surrounds López and Villaverde’s political beliefs perplexing. Villaverde to the last defended his own belief in Cuban independence, and several times wrote in defense of López. Cubans and Americans have debated López’s intentions and Villaverde’s politics, either ignoring or disregarding original sources such as Villaverde’s published statements that are deemed unreliable, pointedly when they contradict or create fissures in the American historical grand narrative.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
NA
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10017/33800
url http://hdl.handle.net/10017/33800
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Franklin de Investigación en Estudios Norteamericanos, Universidad de Alcalá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Franklin de Investigación en Estudios Norteamericanos, Universidad de Alcalá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:e_Buah Biblioteca Digital Universidad de Alcalá
instname:Universidad de Alcalá (UAH)
instname_str Universidad de Alcalá (UAH)
reponame_str e_Buah Biblioteca Digital Universidad de Alcalá
collection e_Buah Biblioteca Digital Universidad de Alcalá
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869422658984083456
score 15,300724