Single-cell RNA sequencing-derived signatures define response patterns to atezolizumab + bevacizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Background & Aims The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (atezo+bev) is the current standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), providing a median overall survival (OS) of 19.2 months. Here, we aim to uncover the underlying cellular processes driving clinical benefit v...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/468218 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.12.016 https://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/468218 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Atezolizumab and bevacizumab Biomarkers of Response |
| Sumario: | Background & Aims The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (atezo+bev) is the current standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), providing a median overall survival (OS) of 19.2 months. Here, we aim to uncover the underlying cellular processes driving clinical benefit vs. resistance to atezo+bev. Methods We harnessed the power of single-cell RNA sequencing in advanced HCC to derive gene expression signatures recapitulating 21 cell phenotypes. These signatures were applied to 422 RNA-sequencing samples of patients with advanced HCC treated with atezo+bev (n = 317) vs. atezolizumab (n = 47) or sorafenib (n = 58) as comparators. Results We unveiled two distinct patterns of response to atezo+bev. First, an immune-mediated response characterised by the combined presence of CD8+ T effector cells and pro-inflammatory CXCL10+ macrophages, representing an immune-rich microenvironment. Second, a non-immune, angiogenesis-related response distinguishable by a reduced expression of the VEGF co-receptor neuropilin-1 (NRP1), a biomarker that specifically predicts improved OS upon atezo+bev vs. sorafenib (p = 0.039). Primary resistance was associated with an enrichment of immunosuppressive myeloid populations, namely CD14+ monocytes and TREM2+ macrophages, and Notch pathway activation. Based on these mechanistic insights we define "Immune-competent" and "Angiogenesis-driven" molecular subgroups, each associated with a significantly longer OS with atezo+bev vs. sorafenib (p of interaction = 0.027), and a “Resistant” subset. Conclusion Our study unveils two distinct molecular subsets of clinical benefit to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in advanced HCC (“Immune-competent” and “Angiogenesis-driven”) as well as the main traits of primary resistance to this therapy, thus providing a molecular framework to stratify patients based on clinical outcome and guiding potential strategies to overcome resistance. |
|---|