Apalutamide for prostate cancer: Multicentre and multidisciplinary real-world study of 227 patients

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apalutamide prostate cancer compared to the pivotal trials patients and to identify the first subsequent therapy in a real-world setting. Methods: The study is prospective and observational based on real-world evidence, performed by different medical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Córdoba Sánchez, Julián, Picola, Natàlia, Rodriguez-Vida, Alejo, Costa, Marc, Marmolejo Castañeda, David, Pérez Márquez, Meritxell, Muñoz-Rodríguez, Jesús, Gaya Sopena, Josep Maria, Bravo, Alejandra, Buisan, Oscar, Servian, Pol, Suárez Novo, José Francisco, Musquera Felip, Mireia, Ribal, María José, Alcaraz Asensio, Antonio, Vilaseca, Antoni
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Repositorio:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/61339
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/61339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6769
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Apalutamide
High-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Prostate cancer
Real-world
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apalutamide prostate cancer compared to the pivotal trials patients and to identify the first subsequent therapy in a real-world setting. Methods: The study is prospective and observational based on real-world evidence, performed by different medical disciplines and eight academics centres around Barcelona, Spain. It included all patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with apalutamide from June 2018 to December 2022. Results: Of 227 patients treated with apalutamide, 10% had ECOG-PS 2, and 41% were diagnosed with new-generation imaging. In the mHSPC group (209 patients), 75 years was the median age, 53% had synchronous metastases, and 22% were M1a. In the nmCRPC (18 patients), 82 years was the median age, and 81% ≤6 months had PSA doubling time. Patients achieved PSA90 in 92% of mHSPC and 50% of nmCRPC and PSA ≤0.2 in 71% of mHSPC and 39% of nmCRPC. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 40.1% of mHSPC and 44.4% of nmCRPC. After discontinuation of apalutamide due to disease progression, 54.5% in mHSPC and 75% in nmCRPC started chemotherapy, while after discontinuation because of adverse events, 73.3% in mHSPC and 100% in nmCRPC continued with other hormonal-therapies. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of apalutamide were similar to that described in the pivotal trials, despite including an older and more comorbid population. Usually, subsequent therapies after apalutamide differed depending on the reason for discontinuation: by disease progression started chemotherapy and by adverse events hormonal sequencing.