Standardisation facilitates reliable interpretation of ETCO2 during manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Background Interpretation of end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) during manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is affected by variations in ventilation and chest compressions. This study investigates the impact of standardising ETCO2 to constant ventilation rate (VR) and compression depth (CD) on absolute val...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Data de publicação: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad del País Vasco |
| Repositório: | Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:addi.ehu.eus:10810/69143 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/69143 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | CPR ETCO2 ventilation rate compression depth capnography ROSC prognosis |
| Resumo: | Background Interpretation of end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) during manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is affected by variations in ventilation and chest compressions. This study investigates the impact of standardising ETCO2 to constant ventilation rate (VR) and compression depth (CD) on absolute values and trends. Methods Retrospective study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases with manual CPR, including defibrillator and clinical data. ETCO2, VR and CD values were averaged by minute. ETCO2 was standardised to 10 vpm and 50 mm. We compared standardised (ETs) and measured (ETm) values and trends during resuscitation. Results Of 1,036 cases, 287 met the inclusion criteria. VR was mostly lower than recommended, 8.8 vpm, and highly variable within and among patients. CD was mostly within guidelines, 49.8 mm, and less varied. ETs was lower than ETm by 7.3 mmHg. ETs emphasized differences by sex (22.4 females vs. 25.6 mmHg males), initial rhythm (29.1 shockable vs. 22.7 mmHg not), intubation type (25.6 supraglottic vs. 22.4 mmHg endotracheal) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) achieved (34.5 mmHg) vs. not (20.1 mmHg). Trends were different between non-ROSC and ROSC patients before ROSC (–0.3 vs. + 0.2 mmHg/min), and between sustained and rearrest after ROSC (–0.7 vs. –2.1 mmHg/min). Peak ETs was higher for sustained than for rearrest (53.0 vs. 42.5 mmHg). Conclusion Standardising ETCO2 eliminates effects of VR and CD variations during manual CPR and facilitates comparison of values and trends among and within patients. Its clinical application for guidance of resuscitation warrants further investigation. |
|---|