Which rules shape EU external governance? Patterns of rule selection in foreign and security policies

This article addresses a particular aspect of EU external governance: rule selection. Drawing on institutionalist and power-based explanations we put forward an account for the choice of the specific rules that guide policy convergence between the EU and third countries. The proposed analytical fram...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Barbé, Esther, Costa, Oriol, Herranz Surrallés, Anna, Natorski, Michal
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2009
País:España
Institución:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Repositorio:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/37234
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/37234
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Common foreign and security policy
European neighbourhood policy
European security and defence policy
Europeanization, external governance
id ES_de881bf271bab707de7a98cc0e7da511
oai_identifier_str oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/37234
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Which rules shape EU external governance? Patterns of rule selection in foreign and security policiesBarbé, EstherCosta, OriolHerranz Surrallés, AnnaNatorski, MichalCommon foreign and security policyEuropean neighbourhood policyEuropean security and defence policyEuropeanization, external governanceThis article addresses a particular aspect of EU external governance: rule selection. Drawing on institutionalist and power-based explanations we put forward an account for the choice of the specific rules that guide policy convergence between the EU and third countries. The proposed analytical framework broadens the scope of the studies examining the externalization of EU rules beyond its borders, in that we claim that the EU can promote policy convergence using rules other than the EU's. More specifically, the EU also promotes policy convergence on the basis of international and bilaterally developed rules. These analytical claims for explaining rule selection are checked against empirical data. We compare policy convergence between the EU and four neighbouring countries (Morocco, Ukraine, Georgia, and Russia) in three subfields within foreign and security policy: foreign policy dialogue, control of export of dual-use goods in the context of non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and crisis management.Taylor & Francis201920192009info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/37234reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPFinstname:Universitat Pompeu FabraInglésJournal of European Public Policy. 2009;16(6):834-52© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of European Public Policy on 2009, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13501760903087845.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/372342026-06-12T07:21:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Which rules shape EU external governance? Patterns of rule selection in foreign and security policies
title Which rules shape EU external governance? Patterns of rule selection in foreign and security policies
spellingShingle Which rules shape EU external governance? Patterns of rule selection in foreign and security policies
Barbé, Esther
Common foreign and security policy
European neighbourhood policy
European security and defence policy
Europeanization, external governance
title_short Which rules shape EU external governance? Patterns of rule selection in foreign and security policies
title_full Which rules shape EU external governance? Patterns of rule selection in foreign and security policies
title_fullStr Which rules shape EU external governance? Patterns of rule selection in foreign and security policies
title_full_unstemmed Which rules shape EU external governance? Patterns of rule selection in foreign and security policies
title_sort Which rules shape EU external governance? Patterns of rule selection in foreign and security policies
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Barbé, Esther
Costa, Oriol
Herranz Surrallés, Anna
Natorski, Michal
author Barbé, Esther
author_facet Barbé, Esther
Costa, Oriol
Herranz Surrallés, Anna
Natorski, Michal
author_role author
author2 Costa, Oriol
Herranz Surrallés, Anna
Natorski, Michal
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Common foreign and security policy
European neighbourhood policy
European security and defence policy
Europeanization, external governance
topic Common foreign and security policy
European neighbourhood policy
European security and defence policy
Europeanization, external governance
description This article addresses a particular aspect of EU external governance: rule selection. Drawing on institutionalist and power-based explanations we put forward an account for the choice of the specific rules that guide policy convergence between the EU and third countries. The proposed analytical framework broadens the scope of the studies examining the externalization of EU rules beyond its borders, in that we claim that the EU can promote policy convergence using rules other than the EU's. More specifically, the EU also promotes policy convergence on the basis of international and bilaterally developed rules. These analytical claims for explaining rule selection are checked against empirical data. We compare policy convergence between the EU and four neighbouring countries (Morocco, Ukraine, Georgia, and Russia) in three subfields within foreign and security policy: foreign policy dialogue, control of export of dual-use goods in the context of non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and crisis management.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009
2019
2019
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/37234
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/37234
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of European Public Policy. 2009;16(6):834-52
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
instname:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
instname_str Universitat Pompeu Fabra
reponame_str Repositorio Digital de la UPF
collection Repositorio Digital de la UPF
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869421982832918528
score 15,812429

Similares en LA Referencia