Comparison of Proclarix, PSA Density and MRI-ERSPC Risk Calculator to Select Patients for Prostate Biopsy after mpMRI
The selection of proper candidates for prostate biopsy after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has usually been studied in the overall population with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). However, the performance of these tools can change regarding the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:292218 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/292218 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.3390/cancers14112702 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Clinically significant prostate cancer PSA density Proclarix MRI-ERSPC Magnetic resonance imaging |
| Resumo: | The selection of proper candidates for prostate biopsy after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has usually been studied in the overall population with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). However, the performance of these tools can change regarding the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) categories. We compared three different tools: PSA density, MRI-ERSPC risk calculator and Proclarix in 567 men with suspected PCa (PSA. |
|---|