ESSKA consensus initiative: why, when and how?

The goal of a Consensus in clinical practice is to provide daily practitioners with evidence- based recommendations on data from the literature, clinical expertise and expectations of professionals and patients. In this context, a consensus aligns with the principles of evidence-based medicine in cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Beaufils, Philippe, Dejour, David, Filardo, Giuseppe, Monllau García, Juan Carlos, Menetrey, Jacques, Seil, Romain, Becker, Roland
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Repositorio:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/60212
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00664-2
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Consensus
Delphi method
Formal Consensus
Guidelines
RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method
id ES_dcf34f2dca90a7e86160e42fca1b6bc2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/60212
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling ESSKA consensus initiative: why, when and how?Beaufils, PhilippeDejour, DavidFilardo, GiuseppeMonllau García, Juan CarlosMenetrey, JacquesSeil, RomainBecker, RolandConsensusDelphi methodFormal ConsensusGuidelinesRAND/UCLA Appropriateness methodThe goal of a Consensus in clinical practice is to provide daily practitioners with evidence- based recommendations on data from the literature, clinical expertise and expectations of professionals and patients. In this context, a consensus aligns with the principles of evidence-based medicine in clinical practice and is consequently regarded as a scientific work of a certain level of evidence (LOE). It is expected that such a project may contribute to filling the gap observed between scientific evidence and reality of the daily practice.A Clinical Consensus is particularly needed for those topics that are of interest to daily practice but controversial due to lack of evidence, and for which expert agreement can provide valuable support in reaching conclusions.A Consensus requires a strict methodology, based on two principles: an iterative process with independence of the involved groups and pluralism (geographical and professional representation). These processes guarantee the scientific quality of the recommendations.Among the various consensus modalities, ESSKA has adopted the Formal Consensus derived from the Delphi method, and the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. These two methods are complementary. The first one, based on questions-answers sets, is particularly suitable for questions of terminology, diagnosis, planning, strategy. The second one is based on the concept of scenarios, particularly adapted to treatment indications. These two methods can also be used within the same consensus.The aim of this article is to define what is a consensus initiative, to detail the methodology ESSKA has chosen, and to point out the key role of the dissemination.Springer202420242023info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/60212http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00664-2reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPFinstname:Universitat Pompeu FabraInglésJ Exp Orthop. 2023 Oct 6;10(1):101© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/602122026-06-12T07:21:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ESSKA consensus initiative: why, when and how?
title ESSKA consensus initiative: why, when and how?
spellingShingle ESSKA consensus initiative: why, when and how?
Beaufils, Philippe
Consensus
Delphi method
Formal Consensus
Guidelines
RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method
title_short ESSKA consensus initiative: why, when and how?
title_full ESSKA consensus initiative: why, when and how?
title_fullStr ESSKA consensus initiative: why, when and how?
title_full_unstemmed ESSKA consensus initiative: why, when and how?
title_sort ESSKA consensus initiative: why, when and how?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Beaufils, Philippe
Dejour, David
Filardo, Giuseppe
Monllau García, Juan Carlos
Menetrey, Jacques
Seil, Romain
Becker, Roland
author Beaufils, Philippe
author_facet Beaufils, Philippe
Dejour, David
Filardo, Giuseppe
Monllau García, Juan Carlos
Menetrey, Jacques
Seil, Romain
Becker, Roland
author_role author
author2 Dejour, David
Filardo, Giuseppe
Monllau García, Juan Carlos
Menetrey, Jacques
Seil, Romain
Becker, Roland
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Consensus
Delphi method
Formal Consensus
Guidelines
RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method
topic Consensus
Delphi method
Formal Consensus
Guidelines
RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method
description The goal of a Consensus in clinical practice is to provide daily practitioners with evidence- based recommendations on data from the literature, clinical expertise and expectations of professionals and patients. In this context, a consensus aligns with the principles of evidence-based medicine in clinical practice and is consequently regarded as a scientific work of a certain level of evidence (LOE). It is expected that such a project may contribute to filling the gap observed between scientific evidence and reality of the daily practice.A Clinical Consensus is particularly needed for those topics that are of interest to daily practice but controversial due to lack of evidence, and for which expert agreement can provide valuable support in reaching conclusions.A Consensus requires a strict methodology, based on two principles: an iterative process with independence of the involved groups and pluralism (geographical and professional representation). These processes guarantee the scientific quality of the recommendations.Among the various consensus modalities, ESSKA has adopted the Formal Consensus derived from the Delphi method, and the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. These two methods are complementary. The first one, based on questions-answers sets, is particularly suitable for questions of terminology, diagnosis, planning, strategy. The second one is based on the concept of scenarios, particularly adapted to treatment indications. These two methods can also be used within the same consensus.The aim of this article is to define what is a consensus initiative, to detail the methodology ESSKA has chosen, and to point out the key role of the dissemination.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00664-2
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00664-2
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv J Exp Orthop. 2023 Oct 6;10(1):101
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
instname:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
instname_str Universitat Pompeu Fabra
reponame_str Repositorio Digital de la UPF
collection Repositorio Digital de la UPF
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869421815937368064
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia