Measurement of the intraocular scattering using different instruments and parameters. Comparative study

[ANGLÈS] Intraocular scattering is the cause of most patient complaints that affect the normal daily activities when they have a cataract. This is the reason why it is important to evaluate when it is the right moment to perform cataract surgery. Nowadays, a variety of subjective methods for classif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Mateos Pena, Lorena
Tipo de recurso: tesis de maestría
Fecha de publicación:2012
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositorio:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2099.1/16120
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2099.1/16120
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Cataract
Optical instruments
Eye--Examination
intraocular scattering
optical quality of the eye
double-pass technique
dispersión intraocular
calidad óptica del ojo
técnica de doble paso
catarata
Cataractes
Òptica--Aparells i instruments
Ulls--Examen
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ciències de la visió::Optometria
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ciències de la visió::Instruments òptics i optomètrics
Descripción
Sumario:[ANGLÈS] Intraocular scattering is the cause of most patient complaints that affect the normal daily activities when they have a cataract. This is the reason why it is important to evaluate when it is the right moment to perform cataract surgery. Nowadays, a variety of subjective methods for classifying opacity, which can allow a somehow standardized procedure, are used by ophthalmologists to diagnose cataracts. Procedures commonly used for this purpose are the visual acuity test, the cataract gradation by means of direct observation of the crystalline lens through a slit lamp, and the Lens Opacity Classification System III (LOCS III). The goal of this study is to perform clinical measurements of intraocular scattering by means of different available commercial instruments that have become common in clinical practice. Specifically, the instruments to be compared will be the C-Quant system, which allows performing a subjective psychophysical assessment, and the OQAS, which is based on the double-pass technique and is totally objective. In this study we analyzed 78 patients with cataracts of different degree and type. The scattering results obtained by means of both instruments and parameters were compared by means of a statistical analysis. The results of the study show that both instruments are good predicting methods of the gradation of different types of cataracts in the clinical practice, although the OSI parameter has shown more statistically significant results. Nevertheless, future studies in this field should focus on a larger number of patients with cortical and subcapsular cataracts in order to find better conclusions.